Title
People vs. Mengote y Tejas
Case
G.R. No. 87059
Decision Date
Jun 22, 1992
Police arrested Mengote based on a tip; found with a firearm, he claimed it was planted. Supreme Court ruled arrest and search unlawful, acquitting him due to inadmissible evidence and lack of probable cause.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 87059)

Facts:

  • Pre-Arrest Circumstances
    • On August 8, 1987, shortly before noon, the Western Police District received an anonymous tip of three “suspicious-looking” persons at the corner of Juan Luna and North Bay Boulevard, Tondo, Manila.
    • A plainclothes surveillance team, including Patrolmen Rolando Mercado and Alberto Juan, was dispatched to the scene.
  • Observations and Apprehension
    • The officers observed two men “looking from side to side,” one clutching his abdomen. Upon identification as police, both suspects attempted flight but were surrounded.
    • A search revealed a .38 caliber Smith & Wesson revolver with six live rounds on Rogelio Mengote and a fan knife on his companion, Nicanor Morellos. Both were turned over to the Intelligence Division at police headquarters.
  • Charging, Trial, and Conviction
    • On August 11, 1987, an information was filed charging Mengote with illegal possession of a .38 caliber S&W revolver (Serial No. 8720-T) in violation of P.D. 1866, for lack of a license or permit.
    • The revolver (Exhibit A), bullets (Exhibit B), and holster (Exhibit C) were admitted over defense objection. Prosecution witness Rigoberto Danganan identified the revolver as stolen during a June 13, 1987 Malabon robbery, implicating Mengote as one of the robbers.
    • Mengote claimed the gun was “planted” and made no proof of ownership or license. The trial court convicted him and imposed reclusion perpetua.

Issues:

  • Whether Mengote’s warrantless arrest was lawful under Rule 113, Section 5 of the Rules of Court.
  • Whether the subsequent search and seizure of the revolver were valid and the weapon admissible in evidence.
  • Whether the testimony linking the seized revolver to the Malabon robbery was properly admitted.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.