Title
People vs. Maramara
Case
G.R. No. 110994
Decision Date
Oct 22, 1999
During a school dance, accused-appellant shot Miguelito Donato, who later died. The Supreme Court convicted him of homicide, not murder, due to insufficient proof of treachery, imposing 10-17 years and ordering civil indemnity and actual damages.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 110994)

Facts:

Incident Overview:

  • On November 18, 1991, a benefit dance was held in Barangay Calpi, Claveria, Masbate, sponsored by the Calpi Elementary School Parents-Teachers Association. Accused-appellant Cresenciano Maramara was the president of the association.
  • During the dance, Ricardo Donato (victim Miguelito Donato's younger brother) was dancing with Rowena del Rosario when Dante Arce, a friend of accused-appellant, boxed Ricardo on the chest. Ricardo fled to the fence for safety, where Miguelito Donato was standing about two meters away.
  • Accused-appellant allegedly took a handgun from his waist and shot Miguelito Donato, hitting him on the left breast. Ricardo tried to help his brother but was struck on the head with an iron bar, rendering him unconscious for about three minutes.
  • Miguelito Donato was rushed to Pio Duran Hospital but died the following morning. Before his death, Miguelito identified accused-appellant as his assailant.

Medical Findings:

  • Dr. Nora L. Presbitero conducted an autopsy on Miguelito Donato’s body and found:
    • A gunshot wound on the left breast.
    • A 4 cm. lacerated wound on the left temporal area.
    • A 4 cm. incised wound on the left parietal area.
    • A 5.5 cm. incised wound on the right iliac area.
  • Dr. Presbitero testified that the wounds could have been inflicted by more than two persons and that accused-appellant had previously been her patient, diagnosed with empyema.

Defense Version:

  • The defense claimed that Ricardo and Miguelito Donato ganged up on Dante Arce during the dance. Accused-appellant intervened to pacify the situation but was allegedly held by Ricardo while Miguelito repeatedly stabbed him with a six-inch bladed weapon.
  • Accused-appellant was hospitalized for multiple stab wounds, including two on the stomach, one on the left nipple, and one on the left arm. Dr. Gil Geñorga, who treated accused-appellant, testified to the severity of his injuries.

Trial Court Decision:

  • The Regional Trial Court convicted accused-appellant of murder, sentencing him to reclusion perpetua and ordering him to pay P10,000.00 for medical and funeral expenses and P50,000.00 as moral damages.

Issues:

  • Whether the trial court erred in convicting accused-appellant of murder based on the credibility of prosecution witnesses.
  • Whether the trial court correctly appreciated treachery as a qualifying circumstance.
  • Whether accused-appellant should be held liable only for death caused in a tumultuous affray under Article 251 of the Revised Penal Code.
  • Whether the trial court erred in awarding moral damages instead of civil indemnity.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.