Case Digest (G.R. No. 171270)
Facts:
This case involves the appellant, Alexander Mangitngit, who was charged with three counts of rape against his daughters BBB and CCC. The Regional Trial Court of Palawan and Puerto Princesa City convicted the appellant of the crimes and sentenced him to death in each case. The court also ordered the appellant to pay moral damages to BBB and CCC. The appellant appealed the decision to the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the trial court's ruling. The case was then elevated to the Supreme Court for automatic review.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
The Supreme Court ruled that the testimonies of BBB and CCC, which were direct, straightforward, and consistent, were sufficient to support a conviction for rape. The court also noted that the medical evidence corroborated the victims' testimonies. The court rejected the appellant's defenses of denial and alibi, stating that the crime of rape can be committed even when the perpetrator and the victim are not alone. The court also found that the appellant failed to prove that it was physically impossible for him to be present at the place of the crime at the time of its commission.
The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's imposition of the de...(Unlock)
Ratio:
The Supreme Court based its ruling on the credibility of the victims' testimonies, which were direct, straightforward, and consistent. The court emphasized that the testimonies of child-victims of rape should be given full weight and credence. The court also considered the medical evidence, which supported the victims' claims of sexual abuse. The court rejected the appellant's defenses of denial and alibi, stating that the crime of rape can be committed even when the perpetrator and t...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 171270)
Facts:
The case involves the conviction of appellant Alexander Mangitngit for raping his daughters BBB and CCC. The Regional Trial Court of Palawan and Puerto Princesa City, Branch 49, found appellant guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crimes of rape and imposed the penalty of death in each case. The court also ordered appellant to pay BBB and CCC the amounts of P75,000.00 each as moral damages. Appellant appealed the decision to the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the trial court's ruling.
The facts of the case are as follows: BBB and CCC, aged 15 and 12 respectively, accused their father of sexually abusing them on separate occasions. BBB testified that her father raped her while she was sleeping in their house. She was awakened by her father's touch and was forced to have sexual intercourse with him. CCC, on the other hand, testified that her father raped her in their family house while their mother was at the family farm. She stated that her father cleared his throat, approached her, and raped her against her will. Both victims reported the incidents to their mother and authorities, and medical examinations confirmed the presence of lacerations in their vaginal areas.
Issue:
The main issue in this case is whether appellant is guilty beyond reasonable doubt of raping his daughters BBB and CCC.
Ruling:
The trial court and the Court of Appeals both found the testimonies of the victims to be credible and consistent. The court ruled that the victims' testimonies were direct, straightforward, and not stained with inconsistencies. The court also noted that the victims had no ill motives to falsely charge and testify against their father. The court emphasized that the credibil...