Title
People vs. Mahinay y Amparado
Case
G.R. No. 122485
Decision Date
Feb 1, 1999
A houseboy, drunk and behaving unusually, raped and killed a 12-year-old neighbor, fleeing afterward. His confession and circumstantial evidence led to a death penalty conviction.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 227021)

Facts:

  • Background
    • Appellant Larry Mahinay y Amparado was employed as houseboy by Maria Isip since November 20, 1993 and lodged in an apartment adjacent to an unfinished house in Valenzuela, Metro Manila.
    • Victim Ma. Victoria Chan, 12 years old, lived nearby and habitually played within Isip’s compound.
  • Events of June 25–26, 1995
    • Morning–afternoon of June 25: appellant joined a drinking spree, then left the compound; victim seen alone in the unfinished house yard.
    • Evening of June 25: appellant appeared disheveled and uneasy in a store facing the compound; later he did not return to his lodging.
    • Early morning of June 26: appellant fled via jeepney to Batangas; later that morning at about 7:30 a.m., resident “Boy” discovered victim’s body in the septic tank.
  • Investigation and Evidence
    • Autopsy findings: asphyxia by manual strangulation; traumatic head injury; multiple contusions and abrasions; hymen lacerations consistent with penile penetration.
    • Crime-scene evidence: victim’s clothing in the unfinished house; appellant’s belongings (slippers, clothes, wallet, pliers) found near the septic tank.
    • Apprehension and confession: arrested July 7, 1995 in Batangas; executed an extrajudicial confession detailing rape and strangulation, with counsel from the Public Attorney’s Office present.
  • Trial Court Proceedings
    • Information for rape with homicide filed July 10, 1995; appellant pleaded not guilty.
    • After trial, the Regional Trial Court convicted him of rape with homicide, sentenced him to death by electric chair, and ordered indemnity of ₱50,000 plus ₱23,000 for funeral expenses.

Issues:

  • Whether the circumstantial evidence presented sufficed to establish appellant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
  • Whether the extrajudicial confession was voluntarily given and properly admitted.
  • Whether appellant’s story of coercion by third parties to rape a cadaver was credible.
  • Whether the death penalty and indemnity awards were correctly imposed under the applicable law.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.