Title
People vs. Macal y Bolasco
Case
G.R. No. 211062
Decision Date
Jan 13, 2016
Accused-appellant convicted of parricide for stabbing wife; defense of accident and absolutory cause rejected; Supreme Court affirmed reclusion perpetua, modified damages.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 18600)

Facts:

  • Parties and Background
    • Accused-appellant Manuel Macal y Bolasco and victim Auria Ytac Macal married in March 2000 in Manila; they had two children (one deceased).
    • The couple resided with Auria’s mother, Angeles Ytac, in V & G Subdivision, Tacloban City; accused worked in Manila and returned home annually.
  • Circumstances of the Killing
    • On February 12, 2003 at around 1:20 AM, Angeles and her children returned from bingo to their house with friends. Auria and accused joined them to the threshold and then went to their bedroom four meters away.
    • Auria screamed “Mother help me, I am going to be killed.” The locked bedroom door was kicked open. Witnesses saw Auria bloodied on the floor and accused attempting self-stabbing with a belt buckle; Auria was declared dead on arrival at the hospital. Accused fled over the fence.
  • Trial Proceedings
    • February 13, 2003: Information for parricide filed; accused pleaded not guilty on July 7, 2003. Parties stipulated to the spousal relationship at pre-trial.
    • Prosecution witnesses Angeles Ytac and Erwin Silvano testified to Auria’s screams, the locked door, the stabbing of Auria by accused, and his self-inflicted wounds. Certificate of Death admitted.
    • Defense witnesses included accused, Benito Billota, and Nerissa Alcantara. Accused admitted the stabbing but claimed he aimed at a man in the room and that Auria shielded him, making the injury accidental; he also wounded himself out of desperation. Nerissa authenticated hospital records of accused’s chest wounds.

Issues:

  • Guilt of Parricide
    • Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt all elements of parricide under Article 246, RPC.
  • Applicability of Exempting/Absolutory Circumstances
    • Whether the defense of accident under Article 12(4), RPC, exonerates accused.
    • Whether Article 247, RPC (spouse caught in act of intercourse) absolves him of liability.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.