Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Lugod
Case
G.R. No. 136253
Decision Date
Feb 21, 2001
An 8-year-old girl was raped and killed in 1997. The accused, Clemente John Lugod, was convicted based on circumstantial evidence and an alleged coerced confession. The Supreme Court acquitted him, citing insufficient proof and constitutional rights violations.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 237514)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Charge and Arraignment
  • On October 10, 1997, an Information for rape with homicide was filed against Clemente John Lugod for allegedly raping and killing eight-year-old Nairube J. Ramos in Cavinti, Laguna on September 16, 1997.
  • Accused pleaded not guilty; trial commenced before the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 28, Santa Cruz, Laguna.
  • Prosecution Evidence
  • Medico-legal Findings: Dr. Edilberto Castillo discovered an 8 cm vaginal laceration and ruled the cause of death as hypovolemic shock secondary to the laceration; cadaver was in advanced decomposition, death occurred approx. three days before his Sept. 19, 1997 examination.
  • Clothing Identification: Violeta Cabuhat and Loreto Veloria testified that on the night of Sept. 15, 1997, Lugod wore a black collared T-shirt (Exh. E) and muddy rubber slippers with red soles and yellow straps (Exh. D).
  • Early Morning Sighting: Tricycle driver Romualdo Ramos and Pedro Dela Torre saw Lugod, appearing drunk, exiting Villa Anastacia barefoot and without a T-shirt around 8:30–10:30 a.m. on Sept. 16, 1997.
  • Discovery of Personal Effects: A search party led by Alma Diaz and Helen Ramos found the victim’s panty (Exh. F) and the same black T-shirt within Villa Anastacia; slippers matching Exh. D were found at the victim’s backdoor.
  • Arrest, Statement and Pointing Out: SPO2 Quirino Gallardo arrested Lugod based on the slippers and T-shirt. He claimed Lugod confessed and later pointed out the body’s location by moving his lips in the presence of police and townspeople.
  • Trial Court Decision
  • On October 8, 1998, the RTC found Lugod guilty beyond reasonable doubt of rape with homicide under R.A. 7659, sentenced him to death, ordered P50,000 civil indemnity and P37,200 actual damages, plus costs.

Issues:

  • Admissibility of Confession and Pointing Out
  • Were Lugod’s uncouns­elled admission and his act of pointing out the body location admissible in evidence under the Constitution’s guarantee of the right to counsel and to remain silent (Art. III, Sec. 12)?
  • Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence
  • Did the circumstantial evidence presented—slippers, T-shirt, sightings—form an unbroken chain proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt and excluding all others?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.