Title
People vs. Labuguen y Francisco
Case
G.R. No. 223103
Decision Date
Feb 24, 2020
Five armed men robbed and killed a family in Isabela in 2002; two perpetrators were convicted of Robbery with Homicide, sentenced to life without parole.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 223103)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background
    • On January 3, 2002 at about 7:30 PM in Delfin Albano, Isabela, spouses Manuel and Nenita Padre and their daughters, Rhoda and Rachelle, were having dinner at home.
    • Five armed and masked men—later identified as Florentino Labuguen (“Tinong”), Romeo Zuniga, Rodrigo Macalinao, John Doe, and Peter Doe—suddenly barged in, armed with a firearm and bladed instrument.
  • Commission of the crime
    • The assailants forcibly separated the family: Labuguen pulled Rachelle into the comfort room with her mother and sister; Manuel was taken to the store by another perpetrator.
    • They stole ₱500,000 from Manuel and Nenita Padre, then assaulted and killed Rhoda (gunshot), Manuel (stab wounds), and Nenita (stab wound). They stabbed and lacerated Rachelle, whose timely medical aid prevented her death.
  • Identification and arrests
    • Rachelle escaped and identified Labuguen and Macalinao to police on January 4, 2002; Labuguen was arrested the same day.
    • Zuniga went into hiding but was arrested in Tarlac in 2006 after Rachelle revealed his identity to prosecutors. Macalinao remains at large.
  • Lower court and appellate decisions
    • RTC Branch 22, Cabagan, Isabela convicted appellants of Robbery with Homicide and Frustrated Homicide on April 15, 2011; imposed reclusion perpetua and ordered civil indemnities.
    • CA in G.R. CR-H.C. No. 04999 (March 25, 2015) affirmed with modification: guilty of Robbery with Homicide, reclusion perpetua, and civil indemnity of ₱75,000 per victim.
    • Supreme Court granted review.

Issues:

  • Can appellant Zuniga avail of the exempting circumstance of irresistible force/uncontrollable fear?
  • Does Rachelle Padre’s delayed identification of the assailants impair its credibility?
  • Was conspiracy to commit the crime of robbery with homicide proven beyond reasonable doubt?
  • Were all elements of robbery with homicide established?
  • What is the proper penalty and quantum of civil and moral/exemplary damages?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.