Title
People vs. Iman
Case
G.R. No. 42660
Decision Date
Sep 12, 1935
A man is convicted of seduction for deceiving a woman with false promises of marriage while engaging in a sexual relationship.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 42660)

Facts:

  • In June 1932, Crispin Iman began courting 17-year-old Corazon Arcadio.
  • Initially unsuccessful, Corazon reciprocated his affections by August 1932 after Crispin's persistent efforts and promises of marriage.
  • In April 1933, Corazon wanted to end the relationship due to Crispin's indecent proposals, but they reconciled each time he professed his love.
  • In May 1933, while Corazon's parents were away, Crispin engaged in sexual relations with her after renewing his marriage promise.
  • Their relationship became sexual, and by October 1933, Corazon discovered she was pregnant.
  • Crispin initially agreed to marry her but later claimed he was engaged to another woman.
  • Corazon's parents intervened, leading to police involvement.
  • On November 7, 1933, Crispin promised to marry Corazon in front of the chief of police but later refused due to family disapproval and religious differences.
  • Corazon gave birth to a son on March 9, 1934.
  • The prosecution presented letters from Crispin affirming their romantic relationship and his marriage promise.
  • The trial court found Crispin guilty of seduction under Article 338 of the Revised Penal Code.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding Crispin Iman guilty of seduction.
  • The court determined that the essential elements of the crime were present, including the promise of marriage and s...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The court emphasized that the promise of marriage is crucial in establishing deceit in seduction cases.
  • A prior promise influencing the victim's consent suffices; it does not need to be reiterated immediately before the act.
  • Corazon's chastity was compromised due to Crispin's repeated promises, leading her to yield to his advances.
  • The absence of...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.