Case Digest (G.R. No. 194235)
Facts:
People of the Philippines v. Jay Gregorio y Amar, Rolando Estrella y Raymundo, Danilo Bergonia y Aleleng, Efren Gascon y delos Santos, Ricardo Salazar y Go, and John Doe, G.R. No. 194235, June 08, 2016, First Division, Leonardo-De Castro, J., writing for the Court.
The prosecution charged five named accused-appellants (and a John Doe) in multiple informations filed October 21, 2002: Criminal Case No. 2867‑M‑2002 (kidnapping for ransom under Article 267 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended by Republic Act No. 7659) and Criminal Case Nos. 2868‑M‑2002, 2869‑M‑2002, and 2870‑M‑2002 (separate informations accusing Jay, Rolando, and Efren of violation of Presidential Decree No. 1866 for illegal possession of firearms). All cases were tried jointly before the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Malolos City, Branch 12.
The prosecution’s evidence described an October 8, 2002 abduction of Jimmy Ting (victim) in Meycauayan, Bulacan: four men posing as NBI agents forced Jimmy into a maroon Tamaraw FX, blindfolded and tied him, and threatened him with death if he did not cooperate. During transport the kidnappers used Jimmy’s cellphone to contact his family and demanded P50,000,000, later negotiating a ransom accepted at P1,780,000 (with deposits of P50,000 on October 10 and another P50,000 on October 14 into Jimmy’s IEB account). Jimmy was held in Ilocos Norte for several days; some kidnappers guarded him while others coordinated ransom negotiations and the payout. The PACER Response and Manhunt Teams arrested Efren and Danilo with a .38 pistol on October 14 in Ilocos; they later arrested Jay, Rolando, and Ricardo on October 15 and recovered about P600,000 of the ransom and two .45 pistols. Jimmy identified five of the six kidnappers at Camp Crame after his rescue and executed a sworn statement recounting the abduction and detention.
The defense witnesses (including the accuseds) claimed the trip to Ilocos was a voluntary “VIP escort” or vacation organized by a Jojo Salazar (the alleged John Doe mastermind) and that Jimmy stayed willingly at Efren’s home; they denied that Ricardo received ransom and portrayed the arrests as mistaken or as robberies committed against the accuseds.
The RTC, in a decision promulgated October 10, 2005, convicted Jay, Rolando, and Ricardo as principals of kidnapping for ransom and found Efren and Danilo guilty as accomplices; it acquitted Jay, Rolando, and Efren of the firearms charges and sentenced the principals to death (the court recommended commutation to life imprisonment). Because death sentences were imposed, the case was automatically reviewed by the Court of Appeals (docketed CA‑G.R. CR.‑H.C. No. 01776). On May 27, 2010 the Court of Appeals affirmed with modification: it found conspiracy among all five accused and held them all equally liable as principals, imposed reclusion perpetua in view of Republic Act No. 9346 (abolishing the death penalty), a...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- Were the accused-appellants proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of kidnapping for ransom?
- Did the Court of Appeals correctly hold accused-appellant Efren D. Gascon liable as a principal rather than merely as...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)