Title
People vs. Gireng y Pinto
Case
G.R. No. 97949
Decision Date
Feb 1, 1995
Armando Gireng is found guilty of the illegal sale of marijuana based on the credible testimony of a witness and the presence of marked bills, despite the absence of a certificate of field test and violation of the appellant's rights during custodial investigation.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 97949)

Facts:

  • Armando Gireng y Pinto, also known as "Mandy," was charged with violating the Dangerous Drugs Act for the illegal sale of marijuana.
  • The incident occurred on May 24, 1989, in Cabanatuan City.
  • Philippine Constabulary (PC) soldier Romeo de Jesus received information from a confidential informant about a suspected drug pusher in DS Garcia, Cabanatuan City.
  • A buy-bust operation was planned, with Sgt. Teofilo Solis designated as the poseur-buyer.
  • De Jesus gave Sgt. Solis two marked P10 bills, and they proceeded to the suspect's house.
  • Appellant Gireng handed four plastic tea bags of marijuana to Sgt. Solis in exchange for the marked bills.
  • De Jesus then approached Gireng, identified himself as a NARCOM agent, and arrested him.
  • The marked bills were recovered from Gireng's pocket, and the marijuana was found in Sgt. Solis's possession.
  • The confiscated items were examined and tested positive for marijuana.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The court ruled that the prosecution has proven Gireng's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
  • All the elements necessary for the offense of illegal sale of marijuana were established, including the identity of the buyer and seller, the object and consideration of the sale, and the delivery of the marijuana and payment.
  • The testimony of de Jesus, the PC soldier who witnessed the transaction, was deemed credible and sufficient to establish the sale.
  • The testimony of the poseur-buyer or confidential informant was not necessary, as de Jesus's testimony was already conclusive.
  • The absence of marked money does not create a gap in the evidence as long as the sale is adequately proven.
  • The omission to present...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The submission of proof of the sale of the illicit drug and the presentation of the corpus delicti are indispensable in every prosecution for illegal sale of marijuana.
  • The court recognized the need for entrapment procedures in anti-narcotics operations and the possibility of abuse.
  • No evidence was f...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.