Title
People vs. Geronimo
Case
G.R. No. L-8936
Decision Date
Oct 23, 1956
Federico Geronimo, a Hukbalahap member, pleaded guilty to rebellion and murder. The Supreme Court ruled his violent acts were absorbed into rebellion but convicted him separately for a murder with private motives.

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-8936)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background
    • On June 24, 1954, the Provincial Fiscal of Camarines Sur filed an information charging Federico Geronimo (alias Cmdr. Oscar) and numerous co-accused with the complex crime of rebellion with murders, robberies, and kidnapping.
    • The alleged rebellion began on or about May 28, 1946, continued “up to the present time,” and was carried out under the direction of the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) and its armed wing, the Hukbong Mapag-palaya ng Bayan (HMB or “Huks”).
  • Overt Acts Alleged in the Information
    • Count 1 (April 28, 1949, Nueva Ecija): Ambush of Mrs. Aurora A. Quezon’s party and her Philippine Constabulary escort, resulting in multiple deaths.
    • Count 2 (August 26, 1950, Santa Cruz, Laguna): Forced opening of the Provincial Treasury vault and theft of ₱80,000, office equipment, and supplies.
    • Count 3 (1951–1952, Libmanan, Camarines Sur): Capture and killing of Police Sergeant Nemesio Palo with treachery and evident premeditation.
    • Count 4 (January 31, 1953, Del Gallego, Camarines Sur): Ambush of an Army patrol under Cpl. Bayrante, wounding two individuals.
    • Count 5 (February 1954, San Fernando, Camarines Sur): Killing of barrio lieutenant Policarpio Tipay by a four-man HMB group led by Cmdr. Oscar.
  • Plea, Trial Court Proceedings, and Sentence
    • Federico Geronimo initially pleaded not guilty but on October 12, 1954, changed his plea to guilty.
    • The Fiscal recommended life imprisonment; defense counsel argued that only simple rebellion was chargeable.
    • On October 18, 1954, the Court of First Instance convicted Geronimo of the complex crime of rebellion with murders, robberies, and kidnappings, sentencing him to reclusion perpetua, a ₱10,000 fine, indemnity of ₱6,000 to each victim’s heirs, and costs.
  • Appeal
    • Geronimo appealed, raising a single issue: whether his offense was a complex crime of rebellion with murders, robberies, and kidnappings, or merely simple rebellion.

Issues:

  • Principal Issue
    • Does the commission of murders, robberies, and kidnapping in furtherance of a rebellion constitute a complex crime, or are those acts absorbed into the single crime of rebellion?
  • Ancillary Questions
    • What is the effect of a plea of guilty on the accused’s liability for distinct offenses?
    • Under Articles 134 and 135 of the Revised Penal Code, when do overt acts become separate crimes rather than constituent elements of rebellion?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.