Title
People vs. Gavarra y Garra
Case
G.R. No. L-37673
Decision Date
Oct 30, 1987
Dominador Gavarra was charged with the crime of Rape with Murder for forcibly having sexual intercourse with an eight-year-old girl and hacking her to death. After trial, the lower court found him guilty of attempted rape with homicide. However, the Supreme Court modified the decision and held Gavarra guilty of murder. The court found that the evidence presented by the prosecution was circumstantial, but Gavarra's extrajudicial confession was admissible as evidence. The court also determined that Gavarra's desistance from the act of rape was voluntary and not due to physical impossibility. Therefore, Gavarra was convicted of murder and sentenced to an indeterminate penalty.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-37673)

Facts:

  • Dominador Gavarra was accused of raping and murdering eight-year-old Celerina Lepiten Leyco on August 19, 1972, in Matnog, Sorsogon.
  • Charges for Rape with Murder were filed against Gavarra by the Assistant Provincial Fiscal on October 4, 1972.
  • The prosecution alleged that Gavarra used violence and intimidation to sexually assault Celerina and subsequently killed her with a bolo.
  • During his arraignment on November 15, 1972, Gavarra pleaded not guilty.
  • The lower court convicted him of attempted rape with homicide, sentencing him to death and ordering P12,000 in indemnity to the victim's heirs.
  • The Supreme Court automatically reviewed the case due to the imposition of the death penalty.
  • The evidence presented was largely circumstantial, with a significant extrajudicial confession from Gavarra, which he later claimed was coerced.
  • The trial court accepted the confession as admissible and credible, leading to Gavarra's conviction.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court modified the lower court's ruling, finding Gavarra guilty of murder instead of attempted rape with homicide.
  • The Court upheld the admissibility and credibility of the extrajudicial confession, rejecting claims of coercion.
  • Gavarra's voluntary desistance from rape precluded a conviction for attempted rape.
  • An indeterminate penalty of twelve years and one day of reclus...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The decision was based on the admissibility and credibility of Gavarra's extrajudicial confession, which was deemed voluntary and supported by surrounding circumstances.
  • The confession was made prior to the 1973 Constitution, which did not require the presence of counsel for admissibility.
  • The trial court's findings regarding the confession were upheld due to insufficient evidence of...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.