Case Digest (G.R. No. L-12011-14) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In The People of the Philippines vs. Alfonso Gatchalian (104 Phil. 664, G.R. Nos. L-12011–14, September 30, 1958), the People sued Alfonso Gatchalian, owner or manager of New Life Drug Store in Zamboanga City, for willfully paying Expedito Fernandez a monthly salary of only ₱60 to ₱90 from August 4, 1951 to December 31, 1953—an amount below the statutory minimum wage of ₱3.00 (later ₱4.00) per day under Section 3 of Republic Act No. 602—thereby accruing an underpayment of ₱1,016.64. Arraigned on June 19, 1956, Gatchalian pleaded not guilty and, on August 29, 1956, moved to dismiss the information, arguing that Section 3 only created a civil liability and that it contained no penal clause. The City Attorney countered that Section 15(a) of the same law imposed criminal penalties for “willful violations of any of the provisions of this Act.” On December 3, 1956, the Court of First Instance of Zamboanga dismissed the informations and ordered civil proceedings for back wages, denying Case Digest (G.R. No. L-12011-14) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Criminal Charges and Trial Court Proceedings
- Alfonso Gatchalian, owner/manager of New Life Drug Store in Zamboanga, was charged in four separate informations (Criminal Cases Nos. 2206–2209) with willfully underpaying his employee, Expedite Fernandez, from August 4, 1951 to December 31, 1953, resulting in an alleged P1,016.64 unpaid wage difference, in violation of Section 3 of Republic Act No. 602 (Minimum Wage Law).
- On June 19, 1956, Gatchalian pleaded not guilty. On August 29, 1956, his counsel moved to dismiss the informations, arguing that (a) the violation did not constitute a criminal offense but only civil liability, and (b) Section 3 carried no penal clause.
- Motion, Hearing, and Trial Court Order
- The City Attorney of Zamboanga opposed the motion, asserting that Section 15 of RA 602 imposed criminal penalties for any willful violation of the Act’s provisions and authorized civil recovery of underpaid wages.
- After hearings on September 25 and December 3, 1956, the Court of First Instance of Zamboanga granted the motion to dismiss with costs de oficio, cancelled bail, and directed the Department of Labor’s regional representative to file a civil suit for the wage difference. A motion for reconsideration was denied, and the People appealed.
Issues:
- Criminality of Underpayment
- Whether a willful failure to pay the statutory minimum wage under Section 3 of RA 602, which lacks its own penal clause, nevertheless constitutes a criminal offense under Section 15(a) of the same Act.
- Sufficiency of the Information and Interpretation of Penal Statutes
- Whether the informations were defective for citing only Section 3 without the specific penal provision.
- Whether penal statutes must be strictly construed to exclude provisions not expressly declared “unlawful.”
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)