Title
People vs. Galleno
Case
G.R. No. 123546
Decision Date
Jul 2, 1998
A 19-year-old accused sexually assaulted a 5-year-old, causing vaginal laceration; medical evidence and victim testimony led to his conviction and death penalty.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 123546)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Procedural Posture
    • Joeral Galleno, 19 years old, was charged with statutory rape under Section 11, Republic Act No. 7659 (amending Article 335, RPC), for allegedly having carnal knowledge of Evelyn Obligar Garganera, a five-year-old child.
    • The Regional Trial Court of the 6th Judicial Region, Branch 14 (Roxas City), convicted him beyond reasonable doubt, sentenced him to death, and ordered indemnity of ₱50,000. The case was automatically elevated for review before the Supreme Court.
  • Circumstances of the Offense
    • On August 16, 1994, about 4:00 PM at Brgy. Balighot, Maayon, Capiz, Galleno entered the unoccupied house of Evelyn’s guardians. Only Evelyn (5) and her brother Eleazar (3) were present.
    • According to prosecution witnesses (victim, uncle Emetario, doctors), Galleno lowered Evelyn’s shorts, made her sit on his lap facing him, and forcibly inserted his erect penis into her vagina, causing a laceration and profuse bleeding.
  • Medical Treatment and Arrest
    • Initial “quack” treatment failed to stop bleeding. On August 17, Dr. Alfonso Orosco found a 1 cm × 0.5 cm vaginal laceration; Evelyn reported a penis insertion.
    • August 18, at Roxas Memorial General Hospital, Dr. Ma. Lourdes LaAada noted a 3 cm anterior vaginal wound with 10–15 cc blood; admission was deferred due to funds.
    • August 19, Dr. Michael Toledo observed a severe compound laceration, required 255 cc blood transfusion; patient confined five days.
    • Guardians reported the crime Aug 18 to SPO1 Durana; Galleno was arrested same day near Balighot Elementary School.
  • Defense Version
    • Galleno pleaded not guilty, claiming he “played” with Evelyn—lifting her—and his long ring fingernail accidentally penetrated her vagina about ¼ inch; he then applied sap of madre de cacao to stop bleeding and left.
    • His father, Raul Galleno, testified Evelyn told him the injury was by a finger, but aunt Penicola allegedly contradicted that.
    • Trial court rejected the defense as inherently improbable, finding victim’s and medical accounts credible and consistent.

Issues:

  • Whether the trial court erred in relying on expert medical testimony that could not conclusively identify the cause of the laceration and failed to detect spermatozoa.
  • Whether the trial court displayed bias and deprived the accused of a fair trial by participating in cross-examination.
  • Whether the warrantless arrest of the accused was unjustified and should have been raised before plea.
  • Whether financial assistance extended by the accused’s parents to the victim’s guardians should be interpreted as an implied admission of guilt.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.