Case Digest (G.R. No. 97432)
Facts:
People of the Philippines v. Ricky Galit y Adamero, Intoy Lucindo y Rebadulla, Marlon Galit y Adamero, and Raquel Tagalog y Rotamulla, G.R. No. 97432, March 01, 1994, the Supreme Court Third Division, Bidin, J., writing for the Court.On October 8, 1990, Avelino Matulac was stabbed inside his grocery, Virgie’s Mini-Grocery, and later died of a penetrating stab wound; P45,000.00 was taken from the cash box. On October 15, 1990 an information for robbery with homicide was filed in the Regional Trial Court (RTC), National Capital Judicial Region, Branch 47, Manila, against Ricky Galit y Adamero, Intoy Lucindo y Rebadulla, Marlon Galit y Adamero, and Raquel Tagalog y Rotamulla.
After trial the RTC rendered judgment on January 11, 1991 finding all four accused guilty of robbery with homicide and sentencing them to suffer reclusion perpetua, ordering joint and several indemnity for actual and moral damages, and ordering return of P900 to the victim’s widow. The trial court, citing Article 189 of P.D. 603, suspended the sentences of Ricky Galit and Raquel Tagalog as youthful offenders and committed them for rehabilitation pending possible discharge.
Only Marlon Galit and Intoy Lucindo filed a notice of appeal; counsel later filed a brief purporting to argue for all four. The appeal reached this Court. The prosecution’s case relied on eyewitness testimony (salesladies Josefina Lucena and Anita Andales), a barangay tanod who aided in apprehending one accused, the crime report and post-mortem, recovered money and knives, and admissions by Lucindo that he stabbed the victim. The defense presented an alternative account: an altercation after an alleged short change, Lucindo’s solitary stabbing (claimed to be from loss of temper), and the presence of the accused at a co-worker’s house later that evening.
The Supreme Court considered the trial court’s credibility findings, the evidence of concerted action at the scene (lookouts, entry, subduing, looting, and flight), Lucindo’s admission of stabbing, and statutory limitations on youthful-offender benefits (amendments to P.D. 603 by P.D. No. 1210). Counsel for Ricky later filed a manifestation (April 17, 1993) seeking release based on a favorable NTSB report; the Solicitor General commented on October 15, 1993 without opposing release provided civil liabilities re...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- Was the trial court’s conviction based solely on the crime report and post-mortem, rendering it invalid?
- Was there sufficient proof of conspiracy among the accused to sustain convictions for robbery with homicide?
- Did the evidence establish robbery with homicide as charged?
- Was Intoy Lucindo entitled to justification by self-defense?
- Were the suspended-sentence benefits under P.D. 603 available to Ricky Galit and Raquel Tagalog given the penalty for robbery...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)