Title
People vs. Galit
Case
G.R. No. 51770
Decision Date
Mar 20, 1985
A construction worker, tortured into confessing to murder, was acquitted as the Supreme Court ruled his coerced confession inadmissible and evidence insufficient.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 188078)

Facts:

  • Crime and Investigation
    • On August 23, 1977, Mrs. Natividad Fernando, a 70-year-old widow, was found dead in her Montalban, Rizal, home with seven wounds from a blunt instrument.
    • More than two weeks later, construction worker Francisco Galit was picked up by Montalban police on suspicion of robbery-homicide and referred to the NBI on September 8, 1977, for further investigation.
  • Custodial Treatment and Confession
    • For five days, Galit was detained and interrogated without counsel, beaten repeatedly, forced to inhale human waste, and otherwise tortured until he conceded guilt and signed a prepared confession (Salaysay) on September 9, 1977.
    • Against his will and without legal assistance, he later participated in photographed reenactment of the crime.
  • Trial Court Proceedings
    • An information for robbery with homicide was filed in the Pasig Circuit Criminal Court, charging Galit and two unknown accomplices with breaking into the victim’s home, killing her to facilitate robbery, and stealing cash and valuables.
    • Prosecution evidence consisted of:
      • The coerced extrajudicial confession.
      • Testimony of Florentino Valentino, who claimed to have overheard Galit admit the crime at their shared residence in Marikina and observed him carrying a bag of coins.
      • Medical-legal reports and photographs of the victim’s wounds.
    • Defense evidence asserted Galit’s alibi in Marikina, denial of participation, and challenged the admissibility of the confession as obtained by torture and without counsel.
  • Trial Court Decision
    • On August 11, 1978, immediately after defense evidence, the trial court convicted Galit of robbery with homicide, imposed death penalty, ordered indemnification of ₱110,000 to the heirs, and costs.
    • No physical evidence linked Galit to the crime scene; conviction rested primarily on the extrajudicial confession and hearsay.

Issues:

  • Whether the extrajudicial confession of Francisco Galit was voluntarily made and admissible in evidence.
  • Whether the prosecution presented sufficient competent evidence to sustain Galit’s conviction for robbery with homicide.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.