Case Digest (G.R. No. 78210)
Facts:
The People of the Philippines v. Eduardo Fernandez y Jocson @ "Eddie Fernandez", Antonio Antido y Balatucan @ "Tony Bagyo", Roberto Labra y Santos @ "Berting Labra" and Benjamin Barcelona y Jungco, G.R. Nos. L-32322-23, January 27, 1982, the Supreme Court En Banc, Barredo, J., writing for the Court.The four accused were charged in two informations arising from a single occasion on September 17, 1969: one for Murder (death of Renato Pangilinan) and another for Frustrated Murder (wounding of Apolinario Lopez). They were tried jointly before the Circuit Criminal Court, Seventh Judicial District, Pasig, which convicted all four — sentencing each to death for murder and imposing penalties for frustrated murder (trial court's dispositive reproduced in the record). The accused appealed to the Supreme Court (appeal taken by the accused).
The prosecution’s narrative — supported by eyewitnesses Rosanna Ortiz (Violeta Orbeta), Hilario Sigua, Apolinario Lopez and a boy witness Fernando Despo — was that a film-location encounter escalated into a pursuit and, at a traffic stoppage on A. Bonifacio near Blumentritt, the victims’ car was surrounded and fired upon from both sides and the rear, causing Pangilinan’s fatal chest wound and wounds to Lopez and Sigua. The prosecution portrayed the four accused as acting in concert, with qualifying circumstances such as evident premeditation, treachery and abuse of superior strength alleged.
Defensive proof and testimony disputed the prosecution’s version. Notably, medical and ballistic evidence showed that accused Eduardo Fernandez himself sustained gunshot wounds that required operations and from whose body a deformed .32-caliber slug was later extracted. Ballistics comparisons by Philippine Constabulary and NBI experts linked that slug to Sigua’s .32 gun. Several police officers testified that Benjamin Barcelona remained at the police precinct during the shooting; Roberto Labra had negative chemistry tests for powder residues and produced witnesses (Director Molina, Chito Baron) supporting an alibi that he left the precinct earlier. The defense claimed incomplete self-defense (Fernandez) and varying alibis (Labra, Barcelona); Antido admitted presence as driver and was implicated in the firing.
On appeal the Supreme Court reviewed credibility of witnesses, the sufficiency to prove qualifying circumstances, the weight of physical/ballistic evidence, and the defenda...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- Was proof beyond reasonable doubt established for the crimes of murder and frustrated murder with the alleged qualifying circumstances of evident premeditation, treachery and abuse of superior strength (in band)?
- Were defendants Roberto Labra and Benjamin Barcelona proven beyond reasonable doubt to have been present and participants in the killing and shooting?
- Were defendants Eduardo Fernandez and Antonio Antido liable for murder and frustrated murder, or did their acts amount to lesser offenses (homicide and frustrated homicide) because of incomplete self-defense and other ...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)