Title
People vs. Fatallo y Alecarte
Case
G.R. No. 218805
Decision Date
Nov 7, 2018
Fatallo acquitted due to prosecution's failure to prove compliance with R.A. 9165's Section 21 and establish unbroken chain of custody for seized drugs.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 218805)

Facts:

  • Parties and Charges
    • Plaintiff-Appellee: People of the Philippines
    • Accused-Appellant: Alvin Fatallo y Alecarte a.k.a. “Alvin Patallo y Alecarte”
    • Informations (March 2, 2004)
      • Criminal Case No. 10471 – Illegal sale of 0.0788 g methamphetamine hydrochloride (“shabu”) to a poseur-buyer for ₱800 marked money (Section 5, Article II, R.A. 9165)
      • Criminal Case No. 10473 – Illegal use of shabu, confirmed positive after laboratory test (Section 15, Article II, R.A. 9165)
  • Buy-Bust Operation (March 1, 2004)
    • Operatives and confidential informant formed a buy-bust team under Police Inspector Excelso Lawzaga, Jr.
    • Meeting place: Jean’s Store, T. Calo, Butuan City, at about 9:00 P.M.
    • Observations by SPO1 Delos Santos and SPO1 Avila:
      • Poseur-buyer and Fatallo exchanged items across well-lit street
      • Poseur-buyer signaled consummation by removing his cap; then disappeared into darkness
    • Arrest and seizure:
      • Fatallo fled upstairs; was cornered, Mirandized, and arrested
      • Marked money (8×P100 bills) seized and matched to pre-marked copies
      • Two sachets of shabu recovered by SPO2 Fulveo Joloyohoy, marked A-1 and A-2, photographed, and inventoried at team office
      • Specimens sent to crime laboratory; subsequent confirmatory tests
  • Defense Version
    • Denial of sale/use: claimed a warrantless raid at 7:00 P.M. by armed men
    • Alleged absence of barangay officials/witnesses; confiscation of personal wallet (₱4,500)
    • No marked money or shabu shown; corroborated by sister Elvie Fatallo Poson
  • Procedural History
    • RTC, Branch 4, Butuan City (March 1, 2012): convicted Fatallo of Sections 5 and 15, R.A. 9165; sentenced to life imprisonment plus ₱500,000 fine and compulsory rehabilitation
    • Court of Appeals (April 30, 2015): affirmed RTC decision; held non-presentation of poseur-buyer not fatal; deviations from Section 21 were minor; chain of custody intact
    • Supreme Court appeal (G.R. No. 218805; November 7, 2018): for review of compliance with Section 21 and chain of custody

Issues:

  • Whether the buy-bust team complied with the mandatory requirements of Section 21, Article II of R.A. 9165 (inventory, photographing, presence of three witnesses immediately after seizure).
  • Whether the chain of custody of the seized drugs was established without breaks.
  • Whether the results of Fatallo’s drug test are admissible, given the legality of his arrest.
  • Whether the presumption of regularity in official duties can overcome the presumption of innocence given the procedural lapses.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.