Title
People vs. De Leon
Case
G.R. No. 129057
Decision Date
Jan 22, 2001
Leopoldo and Dominador de Leon are convicted of murder for the stabbing death of Ignacio Jimenez, with the Supreme Court affirming their conviction based on credible witness testimonies and evidence of conspiracy.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 129057)

Facts:

  • In "People vs. De Leon" (G.R. No. 129057), decided on January 22, 2001, Leopoldo and Dominador de Leon were convicted of murder by the Regional Trial Court of Lingayen, Pangasinan.
  • The incident occurred on June 13, 1996, in Barangay Lomboy, Binmaley, Pangasinan.
  • Eyewitnesses Chito Jimenez (the victim's son) and Annaluz Hilarion testified that Billy de Leon initially attacked Ignacio Jimenez, stabbing him multiple times.
  • Leopoldo held Ignacio's arms while Dominador stabbed him in the head.
  • Ignacio Jimenez died from his injuries at the Pangasinan Provincial Hospital.
  • The defense claimed an alibi, stating Leopoldo and Dominador were elsewhere during the crime.
  • The trial court found the alibi unconvincing and convicted the accused based on credible eyewitness testimonies and medical evidence from Dr. Nicanor Arzadon.
  • The court acknowledged the presence of conspiracy and the qualifying circumstance of abuse of superior strength.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding no reason to disturb its assessment of the credibility of the prosecution witnesses.
  • The defense of alibi was rejected as the identities of the accused were positively established by eyewitnesses.
  • The court found sufficient evidence...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court upheld the trial court's finding that the testimonies of Chito Jimenez and Annaluz Hilarion were credible and consistent in material aspects.
  • Minor inconsistencies in the testimonies were deemed insignificant and did not affect their substance.
  • The court emphasized that a witness's relationship with the victim does not necessarily tarnish credibility, especially without any improper motive.
  • The defense of alibi was considered weak and unconvincing, pa...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.