Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Dalisay y Bagro
Case
G.R. No. 258060
Decision Date
Aug 16, 2023
Edward Dalisay, arrested for illegal firearm and drug possession, was convicted of firearm charges but acquitted of drug charges due to chain-of-custody lapses.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 258060)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Nature of the Case
    • The People of the Philippines (Plaintiff-Appellee) charged Edward Dalisay y Bagro (Accused-Appellant) with violations of:
      • Section 28(a) and (e), Article V in relation to Section 3(dd), subparagraph 1(ii), Article I of Republic Act No. 10591 ("Comprehensive Firearms and Ammunition Regulation Act") for illegal possession of firearms and ammunition; and
      • Section 11, Article II of Republic Act No. 9165 ("Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002") for illegal possession of dangerous drugs.
    • The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the conviction rendered by the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Batangas City in Criminal Case Nos. 19010 and 19011. This appeal challenges that affirmation.
  • Circumstances of Arrest and Seizure
    • On July 22, 2014, at around 9:35 p.m., PO2 Ponciano V. Asilo, a police officer of the Station Anti-Illegal Drugs Special Operations Task Force (SAIDSOTE) of Batangas City Police Station, received information from a confidential informant that accused-appellant, alias Edu/Puwit, was seen carrying a gun in Barangay Gulod Itaas, Batangas City.
    • PO2 Asilo relayed the tip to his colleagues PO3 Alexander Olea and PO3 Jonas Guarda, and they proceeded to the area in an unmarked vehicle.
    • At the site, while inside the vehicle, they observed accused-appellant sitting on a motorcycle and apparently showing a shiny object (later identified as a firearm) to another person.
    • The police officers alighted and accosted accused-appellant. PO2 Asilo confiscated a homemade Black Widow Magnum caliber .22 revolver marked "PVA," loaded with five live ammunitions with markings "PVA 1" to "PVA 5."
    • Accused-appellant failed to present any firearm license or permit. He was arrested and frisked, during which a transparent plastic sachet containing 11.50 grams of suspected methamphetamine hydrochloride ("shabu") marked "PVA 07-22-A14" was found in his right pocket.
    • The police officers marked and inventoried the seized firearm, ammunitions, and drugs at the Barangay Hall of Gulod Itaas in the presence of accused-appellant, a DOJ representative, and Barangay Councilor Cueto. Efforts to summon media representatives failed.
    • The seized items were then turned over to SPO1 Pepito Reyes Adelantar, who transported them to the Batangas Provincial Crime Laboratory for examination and testing of the suspect.
  • Testimonies and Stipulations Regarding Chain of Custody
    • The parties stipulated testimony from several witnesses confirming:
      • Entry of the arrest in the barangay blotter by Barangay Councilor Cueto;
      • Preparation and signing of the Certificate of Inventory by Councilor Cueto, SPO1 Adelantar, and presence of DOJ witnesses;
      • Proper handling, marking, and custody of the seized items by SPO1 Adelantar and SPO4 Jesus T. Agustin Jr., evidence custodian of the crime lab;
      • Receipt and laboratory examination of the seized specimen by PSI Herminia Carandang Llacuna, confirming the substance as methamphetamine hydrochloride;
      • Delivery of the specimen to the court by PO2 Isidro Manalo;
      • Certification by the PNP Firearms and Explosives Office dated October 23, 2014 establishing accused-appellant was not a licensed firearms holder.
  • Accused-Appellant's Defense
    • Denied being the person arrested; recounted being forcibly taken by men wearing masks who accused him of being "Joey," whom he purportedly was not.
    • Claimed he was made to show driver’s license but was forcibly detained and later shown evidence purportedly planted against him.
    • Argued non-recognition or actual knowledge of arrest in Barangay Gulod Itaas.
  • RTC Decision
    • Found accused-appellant guilty beyond reasonable doubt of illegal possession of firearms (Criminal Case No. 19010) and illegal possession of dangerous drugs (Criminal Case No. 19011).
    • Held that arrest was valid without a warrant due to flagrante delicto possession of firearm without license.
    • Concluded chain of custody was unbroken and evidence integrity preserved regarding the firearm and drugs.
    • Imposed corresponding penalties including life imprisonment for the drug charge.
  • CA Decision
    • Affirmed RTC Decision but modified the penalty for illegal possession of firearms to a reduced indeterminate prison term ranging from eight years and one day to eleven years and four months prision mayor.
    • Considered Police testimony credible and lawful arrest and search valid.
    • Rejected appellant's denial and contention that firearm possession was fabricated.

Issues:

  • Whether accused-appellant was validly arrested without warrant and whether the search conducted was lawful.
  • Whether accused-appellant’s conviction for illegal possession of firearms and ammunition under R.A. 10591 was proper.
  • Whether accused-appellant’s conviction for illegal possession of dangerous drugs under R.A. 9165 was proper.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.