Title
People vs. Cruz y Cruz
Case
G.R. No. 187047
Decision Date
Jun 15, 2011
Appellant convicted for illegal sale of shabu in a buy-bust operation; warrantless arrest upheld, defense of frame-up rejected, life imprisonment affirmed.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 187047)

Facts:

  • Charges and Initial Proceedings
    • Manuel Cruz y Cruz (appellant) was charged with violation of Sections 5 and 11, Article II of Republic Act No. 9165 (Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002) in two separate Informations dated 24 February 2005.
    • Criminal Case No. 05-0254 charged him with illegal sale of 1.53 grams of methylamphetamine hydrochloride (shabu).
    • Criminal Case No. 05-0255 charged him with illegal possession of 1.42 grams of shabu.
    • Upon arraignment, appellant pleaded not guilty to both charges, and the pre-trial conference was terminated by agreement.
  • Prosecution’s Case
    • Police Officers Nemesio Gallano (poseur-buyer) and Darwin Boiser (back-up) of the District Anti-Illegal Drugs Special Operation Team (DAID-SOT) conducted a buy-bust operation against appellant.
    • A male informant reported that alias “Maning” was selling illegal drugs in Parañaque City; this information was verified by PO2 Gallano through inquiries with residents who confirmed it.
    • The buy-bust team was composed of PO2 Gallano as poseur-buyer, PO2 Boiser as back-up, and other operatives as perimeter security. Buy-bust money totaling P2,000.00, in four P500.00 bills marked with the initials “JG,” was given to PO2 Gallano.
    • The team proceeded to the target area; the male informant introduced PO2 Gallano to appellant (alias Maning) as a security guard seeking shabu for personal use.
    • After negotiation, appellant took the marked money and gave one sachet containing white crystalline substance to PO2 Gallano.
    • PO2 Gallano gave a missed call to PO2 Boiser as a pre-arranged signal. The police arrested appellant immediately and recovered another sachet from his possession.
    • The two sachets and the marked money were marked and submitted for laboratory examination.
    • Chemistry Report No. D-143-05 confirmed the substances to be methylamphetamine hydrochloride (shabu).
  • Defense’s Case
    • Appellant denied the charges, claiming he was working as a dispatcher on the day of the charges and was at home when police officers arrested him without explanation.
    • He alleged that police officers handcuffed and forcibly brought him to their station and detained him without cause.
    • He denied selling or possessing shabu and claimed the evidence was planted to extort money from him.
  • Trial Court Decision and Appeal
    • The RTC convicted appellant of illegal sale of shabu (Criminal Case No. 05-0254), imposing life imprisonment and a fine of P500,000.00.
    • Criminal Case No. 05-0255 (possession) was dismissed, considering the amount of shabu as part and parcel of the illegal sale.
    • Appellant appealed to the Court of Appeals, raising grounds that his warrantless arrest was illegal and the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
    • The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction in toto.

Issues:

  • Whether the warrantless arrest of appellant was lawful given the circumstances.
  • Whether the prosecution sufficiently proved appellant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt for illegal sale of shabu.
  • Whether the alleged planting of evidence and failure to record the marked money in police blotter affect the admissibility of evidence and the validity of the prosecution’s case.
  • Whether the dismissal of possession charge is proper considering the quantity of drugs involved.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.