Title
People vs. Cortezano
Case
G.R. No. 123140
Decision Date
Sep 23, 2003
Two uncles convicted of raping their 7-year-old niece in 1990; alibi defense rejected, minor inconsistencies dismissed. Penalties reduced due to minority.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-30714)

Facts:

Indictments and Trial: On November 22, 1994, two separate Informations were filed against appellants Bernardo Cortezano and Joel Cortezano for the rape of their niece, a 7-year-old minor, on May 6, 1990, and June 10, 1990, in Barangay Azucena, Sipocot, Camarines Sur. Both appellants pleaded not guilty, and a consolidated trial ensued.

Prosecution's Case: In March 1990, the victim, AAA (the minor niece of the appellants), stayed with her grandparents in Sipocot, Camarines Sur, along with her siblings. Her mother, Lourney, left for Manila in April 1990, leaving the children in the custody of their grandparents. On May 6, 1990, the appellants forced AAA into their grandparents’ room, undressed her, and took turns raping her, with one acting as a lookout. They threatened to kill her if she reported the incident. The abuse allegedly occurred daily. On June 10, 1990, the appellants again raped AAA.

Medical Evidence: In 1994, AAA’s mother learned of the abuse through Boyet Orcine, a cousin of the appellants. AAA was examined by Dr. Ma. Cristina B. Freyra, who found healed hymenal lacerations consistent with sexual abuse.

Defense’s Case: Bernardo claimed to be working in another barangay during the alleged incidents. Joel asserted that he was hospitalized in Manila for leukemia during the relevant period. Both denied the charges.

Issues:

  • Whether the appellants, Bernardo Cortezano and Joel Cortezano, are guilty beyond reasonable doubt of four counts of rape.
  • Whether the trial court erred in giving full credence to the testimony of the victim, AAA, despite alleged inconsistencies.
  • Whether the defense of alibi presented by the appellants can prevail over the positive identification by the victim.
  • Whether the penalties and damages awarded by the trial court are appropriate.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.