Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Catantan y Tayong
Case
G.R. No. 118075
Decision Date
Sep 5, 1997
Two fishermen were attacked, hogtied, and their boat seized at gunpoint by Emiliano Catantan, leading to his piracy conviction under PD No. 532.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 118075)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Charge
    • People of the Philippines filed a complaint against Emiliano Catantan y Tayong and Jose Macven Ursal alias “Bimbo” for violation of PD No. 532 (Anti-Piracy and Highway Robbery Law of 1974).
    • The accused were charged with conspiracy to, by means of violence and intimidation, attack, assault and inflict physical injuries on Eugene Pilapil and Juan Pilapil Jr., and to seize their fishing boat on 27 June 1993 in the waters off Tabogon, Cebu.
  • Factual Narrative
    • At approximately 3:00 AM on 27 June 1993, the Pilapil brothers were fishing about 3 km from Tabogon shore when a pumpboat with four persons approached.
    • Emiliano Catantan boarded the Pilapils’ pumpboat, leveled and fired his revolver, struck Eugene on the cheekbone, and ordered both brothers to lie face-down (“dapa”).
    • Catantan and Ursal hogtied Eugene, covered him with a tarpaulin, stepped on him, and forced Juan Jr. to navigate first to Daan Tabogon.
    • After the engine failed twice, Eugene’s hands were freed so he could assist in rowing under threat of death if he spoke.
    • Upon sighting another pumpboat owned by “Juanito,” Catantan forced the Pilapils to board it at gunpoint to proceed to Mungaz; during transfer, the Pilapils’ boat broke, throwing Eugene into the sea, enabling both brothers to escape and report the incident.
  • Trial and Appeal
    • The Regional Trial Court of Cebu found both Catantan and Ursal guilty of piracy under PD No. 532 and sentenced them to reclusion perpetua.
    • Only Emiliano Catantan appealed, contending that the acts constituted grave coercion under Art. 286 of the Revised Penal Code, not piracy under PD No. 532, arguing lack of intent to permanently deprive or seize the vessel.

Issues:

  • Classification of Offense
    • Whether Catantan’s boarding of the Pilapils’ pumpboat and subsequent use of force to compel navigation elsewhere constitutes piracy under PD No. 532 or merely grave coercion under Art. 286 of the Revised Penal Code.
  • Elements of Piracy vs. Grave Coercion
    • Whether there was an “attack upon or seizure of any vessel” by means of violence or intimidation as required by PD No. 532.
    • Whether the absence of intent to permanently deprive or the temporary nature of control negates piracy.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.