Title
People vs. Callao y Marcelino
Case
G.R. No. 228945
Decision Date
Mar 14, 2018
Hesson Callao and Junello Amad conspired to murder Fernando Adlawan, stabbing him, removing his organs, and feeding them to a pig. Convicted of murder based on credible witness testimony, conspiracy, and treachery, Hesson’s appeal was dismissed.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 228945)

Facts:

  • Parties and Procedural History
    • Accused-appellant: Hesson Callao y Marcelino; Co-accused: Junello Amad.
    • Information filed February 14, 2007 for murder under Art. 248, RPC; arraignment March 17, 2008 (plea: not guilty).
    • Trial Court (RTC Bais City, Branch 45): Judgment January 26, 2015 convicting Hesson of murder with treachery; sentenced to reclusion perpetua and damages.
    • Court of Appeals (18th Div.): Decision August 31, 2016 affirmed with modification (increased civil indemnity and moral damages; added exemplary damages).
  • Prosecution’s Version
    • Witness Sario Joaquin testified that on July 15, 2006 in Tayasan, Negros Oriental, he overheard Hesson and Junello plan to kill Fernando Adlawan, at the behest of one Enrile Yosores.
    • That evening, the group went to Fernando’s house; Junello struck Fernando on the nape with firewood then hacked him with a bolo. When Fernando fell motionless, Hesson stabbed him twice in the chest with a knife, sliced open his chest, extracted the heart, and—along with Junello who extracted the liver—fed the organs to a pig, then dismembered the body.
    • Sario did not intervene for fear of death; he later hid the incident under threat. Remmy Casello (another companion) was later killed. Death certificate showed cause of death: internal hemorrhage from multiple stab wounds.
  • Defense Version
    • Hesson denied participation, claiming he was in Fernando’s house cooking rice when he saw Junello and Enrile kill Fernando; he hid until morning.
    • He denied conspiracy with Junello and did not admit stabbing; testified to flight out of fear but gave inconsistent relocation timeline.

Issues:

  • Sufficiency of Uncorroborated Testimony
    • Whether conviction based solely on Sario’s lone testimony violates the requirement for corroboration.
  • Existence of Conspiracy
    • Whether elements of conspiracy between Hesson and Junello were proven beyond reasonable doubt.
  • Nature of the Crime (Impossible Crime)
    • Whether Hesson’s act constituted an impossible crime rather than murder because the victim was allegedly already dead when stabbed.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.