Title
People vs. Cacho y Songco
Case
G.R. No. 218425
Decision Date
Sep 27, 2017
Accused-appellant, diagnosed with mental illness, beheaded victim and burned his house. Convicted of Homicide and Destructive Arson; insanity defense rejected. Penalties and damages imposed.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 209527)

Facts:

  • Charges and background
    • Wilson Cacho y Songco (accused-appellant) was charged with Murder (Criminal Case No. 7522) and Destructive Arson (Criminal Case No. 7523) committed on or about January 1, 2004, in Rodriguez, Rizal.
    • Murder charge: Accused, armed with a bladed weapon, willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously attacked and beheaded Mario Balbao y Adami with qualifying circumstances of treachery, evident premeditation, and nighttime.
    • Destructive Arson charge: Accused willfully and feloniously set fire to and burned the victim’s house to conceal evidence of the crime of murder, motivated by spite or hatred.
  • Investigation and arrest
    • On January 2, 2004, police and Bureau of Fire Protection personnel responded to a report of fire in Sitio Catmon, Brgy. San Rafael, Rodriguez, Rizal.
    • Investigators found the burned house of Mario Balbao and the burned, headless body of a man underneath an iron sheet.
    • Willy Cacho informed police that his brother, the accused-appellant, killed Mario. Accused-appellant’s wife said he suffered recurring mental illness and was a patient at the National Center for Mental Health (NCMH).
    • Police discovered in accused-appellant’s backyard a shallow pit with a steel peg, ashes, and a human skull, believed used to burn a head.
    • Upon confronting accused in his backyard, he acted strangely, admitted killing Mario and burning the house but refused to state the motive; he resisted arrest and was subdued and taken into custody.
    • Accused-appellant was brought for inquest and later confined at the NCMH.
  • Trial and rulings below
    • Accused pleaded not guilty; trial ensued focusing on the issue of insanity due to accused’s admission of the acts.
    • The Regional Trial Court (RTC) convicted accused of Murder and Destructive Arson and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua on both counts, awarding damages to the victim’s heirs.
    • The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the RTC Decision.
    • Accused appealed to the Supreme Court, raising the sufficiency of evidence on the defense of insanity and the crimes charged.

Issues:

  • Whether the accused-appellant sufficiently proved his defense of insanity.
  • Whether the crimes of Murder and Destructive Arson were sufficiently established beyond reasonable doubt.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.