Title
People vs. Borja
Case
G.R. No. 199710
Decision Date
Aug 2, 2017
PO3 Borja kidnapped Ronalyn for ransom; despite her drug arrest, kidnapping charges stood. Court convicted based on all proven elements, dismissing his alibi.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 199710)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Incident and Abduction
    • On May 26, 2004 at about 10:00 a.m., PO3 Julieto Borja grabbed Ronalyn G. Manatad by the right forearm as she walked with Vicky Lusterio along Agham Road, Diliman, Quezon City, and forced her into a gray van with three other men.
    • Lusterio escaped and informed Ronalyn’s mother, Adelina Manatad. Borja and his companions drove the victim around Quezon City for several hours.
  • Ransom Demand and Entrapment
    • A kidnapper calling himself Major Clarito contacted the family, initially demanding ₱200,000 and later reducing it to ₱100,000. Edwin G. Silvio, the victim’s brother, negotiated under the guidance of Sergeant Abet Cordova of NAKTAF.
    • At 3:00 p.m., Edwin placed the money in an SM plastic bag at the Wildlife Park on Quezon Avenue. Borja accepted the bag and was immediately arrested; police recovered a .9 mm pistol, Borja’s cellphone, wallet, and the ransom.
  • Non-Rescue and Subsequent Events
    • Ronalyn, still in the van, heard her captors curse her for alerting NAKTAF. She was then taken to the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency and charged with illegal sale of shabu.
    • She was convicted of violating Republic Act No. 9165 and incarcerated in the Women’s Correctional Facility, Mandaluyong.
  • Procedural History
    • May 28, 2004 – Information filed for kidnapping under Article 267, RPC; Borja pleaded not guilty. RTC Branch 76 found him guilty on October 20, 2008 and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua.
    • March 14, 2011 – Court of Appeals affirmed with modification (₱50,000 civil indemnity; ₱50,000 moral damages). Borja appealed to the Supreme Court, which resolved the case on August 2, 2017.

Issues:

  • Whether PO3 Borja is guilty beyond reasonable doubt of kidnapping for ransom under Article 267 of the Revised Penal Code.
  • Whether the victim’s subsequent arrest and conviction under RA 9165 negates Borja’s criminal liability for kidnapping.
  • Whether Borja’s status as a police officer precludes prosecution for kidnapping.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.