Title
People vs. Bisda
Case
G.R. No. 140895
Decision Date
Jul 17, 2003
A 5-year-old girl was kidnapped for ransom in Marikina City, Philippines, in 1998. Appellants lured, detained, and demanded P5M; rescued after 6 days. Supreme Court upheld death penalty, awarded damages.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 15870)

Facts:

  • Parties, procedural posture, and charge
    • People of the Philippines as Appellee; Alma Bisda y Gaupo and Generosa "Jenny Rose" Basilan y Payan as Appellants.
    • Amended Information in Criminal Case No. 98-2647-MK charged appellants with kidnapping for ransom under Article 267 of the Revised Penal Code, alleging deprivation of liberty of Angela Michelle Soriano y San Juan for six days for the purpose of extorting ransom.
    • Appellants pleaded not guilty at arraignment. The Regional Trial Court (RTC), Marikina City, Branch 272, convicted them of kidnapping for ransom and sentenced each to death by lethal injection, ordered indemnity of P100,000 to the victim’s parents, and costs.
  • Facts of the abduction and investigation
    • Victim Angela, age five during school year 1997–1998, attended Mother of Divine Providence School in Marikina Heights; her parents were William and Marymae Soriano.
    • Appellant Jenny Rose was known to Angela through the household helpers; on September 3, 1998, appellants met Angela near the school gate, showed a visitor’s pass to the security guard, told her parents were waiting at Jollibee, and induced her to go with them.
    • According to the victim, appellant Alma held her hand tightly and poked a knife at her, rendering the child unable to refuse; they rode a tricycle to Jollibee, then a taxi to a rented small house described as a "dirty house" where Angela’s clothes were changed and she was detained.
    • During detention at appellant Bisda’s office/house at No. 1258 Paz Street, Paco, Manila, Angela was fed, bathed, allowed to watch television and draw, but at one time her hands and feet were tied and scotch tape was placed over her mouth; the door to the premises was kept locked.
    • William Soriano and school personnel reported Angela missing; PAOCTF organized a surveillance and recovery operation.
    • Ransom-related telephone contacts: on September 4 a woman left a message; on September 5 William received a call demanding PHP 5,000,000; on September 7 Marymae received repeated ransom calls and asked to reduce the demand to PHP 25,000–50,000; on September 8 William received another call asking where the money was and rejecting offers of PHP 25,000 or PHP 50,000.
    • PAOCTF surveillance led to sighting appellant Alma emerging from a small house near Paz Street; operatives observed Alma use a telephone at a nearby store contemporaneously with William receiving the September 8 call; operatives heard a car horn during the telephone call.
    • Operatives confronted Alma outside her house; upon entry they heard a child cry and recovered Angela inside; seized items included a pair of black shoes, a pair of panties, a yellow shirt, and a blouse-and-shorts set sized for a child.
    • Jenny Rose surrendered to PAOCTF on October 26, 1998; she was fingerprinted, participated in a police lineup, and Angela identified her as one of the kidnappers; prosecutor amended the Information to name Jenny Rose as second accused.
  • Defense...(Subscriber-Only)

Issues:

  • Sufficiency of evidence and elements of the offense
    • Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt the elements of kidnapping or serious illegal detention under Article 267 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended by RA No. 7659.
    • Whether the prosecution proved the qualifying circumstance that the detention was for the purpose of extorting ransom, thereby warranting the death penalty.
  • Conspiracy and principal liability
    • Whether the prosecution proved concert of action or conspiracy under Article 8 of the Revised Penal Code, making each appellant a principal.
  • Competency and credibility of the child witness
    • Whether the trial court erred in admitting and crediting Angela’s testimony without a voir dire or explicit examination on her capacity to distinguish right from wrong.
    • ...(Subscriber-Only)

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.