Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Benipayo
Case
G.R. No. 154473
Decision Date
Apr 24, 2009
COMELEC Chair Benipayo faced libel complaints for public remarks; RTC dismissed, citing lack of jurisdiction. Supreme Court ruled RTC has exclusive jurisdiction over libel, reinstating cases for trial.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 205836)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • G.R. No. 154473
    • On January 31, 2002, Alfredo L. Benipayo, then COMELEC Chair, delivered a speech at the University of the Philippines–Diliman, later published in the Manila Bulletin (Feb. 4–5, 2002). He accused Photokina Marketing Corporation of attempting to “hoodwink” the government into a disadvantageous ₱6.5 billion contract.
    • Photokina filed an Affidavit-Complaint for libel with the Quezon City Prosecutor, who filed an Information (Crim. Case No. Q-02-109407) before RTC Branch 102. Benipayo challenged jurisdiction, claiming status as an impeachable officer and that only the Sandiganbayan could try libel committed in relation to office.
    • RTC Branch 102 dismissed the case (June 18, 2002) for lack of jurisdiction, finding that the alleged libel was committed in his official capacity and thus fell under Sandiganbayan jurisdiction. A motion for reconsideration was denied (June 23, 2002).
  • G.R. No. 155573
    • On March 13, 2002, on the ANC-23 show “Point Blank,” Benipayo alleged that Photokina funds amounting to US$2.4 million (≈₱120 million) were used in a PR campaign against him.
    • Photokina filed an Affidavit-Complaint for libel; the Prosecutor filed an Information (Crim. Case No. Q-02-109406) before RTC Branch 101. Benipayo raised similar jurisdictional objections.
    • RTC Branch 101 dismissed the case (June 25, 2002) and denied reconsideration (September 18, 2002), holding that libel committed in relation to office fell under Sandiganbayan’s exclusive jurisdiction.

Issues:

  • Does the RTC have exclusive original jurisdiction over libel (written defamation) cases to the exclusion of all other courts?
  • If jurisdiction is shared with the Sandiganbayan, does the relation of the libelous act to public office affect the proper forum?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.