Title
People vs. Basay
Case
G.R. No. 86941
Decision Date
Mar 3, 1993
Jaime Ramirez acquitted as extra-judicial confession and dying declaration deemed inadmissible; prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 86941)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Criminal Complaint and Arrest
    • On March 24, 1986, a criminal complaint for multiple murder with arson was filed against Teodoro Basay and Jaime Ramirez (“Neboy”) in the MCTC of Pamplona–Amlan–San Jose, Negros Oriental, for the killing of spouses Zosimo and Beatrice Toting and their daughter Bombie, and for burning the Toting house, causing the death of daughter Manolita and injuring son Manolo.
    • A warrant of arrest issued March 31, 1986; the accused had been apprehended on March 6, 1986 by PC and CHDF personnel and detained without bail.
  • Preliminary Proceedings and Information
    • April 15, 1986 – the accused filed a waiver of preliminary investigation; records forwarded to the Provincial Fiscal.
    • August 14, 1986 – complaint amended to include victim Manolo Toting (nonfatal burns).
    • December 11, 1986 – Information for multiple murder, frustrated murder with arson filed in RTC Branch 40. Arraignment on February 23, 1987; both pleaded not guilty.
  • Trial and Evidence
    • Prosecution witnesses: medical doctors, the MCTC judge, PC officers, and others; presented extrajudicial confession of Ramirez and a statement by surviving child Bombie.
    • Defense witnesses: the accused, Joven Lopez, Maxima Basay; Ramirez testified in surrebuttal.
    • Trial court’s Decision (December 14, 1988):
      • Acquitted Teodoro Basay for failure of proof.
      • Convicted Jaime Ramirez of multiple murder with arson; sentenced to life imprisonment and P30,000 civil indemnity.
  • Appeal to the Supreme Court
    • Ramirez did not file a notice of appeal, but the trial court erroneously transmitted the record for automatic review (life imprisonment is not a death penalty).
    • On May 8, 1989, the Supreme Court took cognizance of the case.

Issues:

  • Admissibility of Ramirez’s extrajudicial confession (Exhibit “F”):
    • Whether it was obtained in violation of the constitutional right to counsel and to remain silent.
    • Whether warnings were given in a language understood and whether waiver complied with requirements.
  • Admissibility and reliability of Bombie Toting’s statement:
    • Whether it qualified as a dying declaration.
    • Whether the child was a competent witness and the statement given under consciousness of impending death.
  • Presumption of guilt based on flight:
    • Whether Ramirez’s attempt to run upon seeing law enforcers constituted flight indicative of guilt.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.