Case Digest (G.R. No. L-42666)
Facts:
The People of the Philippines prosecuted Herminio Barut, Alejo Ramiscal and Ernesto Quebral for robbery with homicide arising from an incident on June 15, 1969 at Sitio Basilio, Barrio San Jose, Roxas, Isabela, in which Acson, one of five malefactors, held up octogenarian Francisco Lazaro, took P23 and carpentry tools, and a later encounter between the malefactors and a rescue party resulted in the death of Evaristo Tuvera and of Acson; stolen articles were recovered. The municipal investigation produced affidavits and a complaint in July 1969, warrants were served years later, the case was elevated to the Court of First Instance on January 9, 1974, an information was filed on February 19, 1974, and the CFI convicted the three appellants of robbery with homicide, sentencing each to reclusion perpetua and ordering indemnity.Issues:
- Did the trial court fail to state the ultimate facts supporting its conviction as required by Rule 120?
- Was the investigation by the Constabulary
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-42666)
Facts:
- Parties and case posture
- THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES was the plaintiff-appellee.
- HERMINIO BARUT, ALEJO RAMISCAL and ERNESTO QUEBRAL were the accused-appellants convicted by the Court of First Instance of Isabela of robbery with homicide.
- The trial court sentenced each accused to reclusion perpetua, ordered them to pay solidarily P12,000 as indemnity to the heirs of Evaristo Tuvera, and ordered return of recovered articles to Francisco Lazaro; one co-accused, Agustin, remained at large.
- Facts of the incident
- On June 15, 1969, shortly after sundown, Marcelino Grospe saw Barut, Ramiscal, Quebral, Juan Agustin and Castor Acson proceed toward the hut or camarin of octogenarian Francisco Lazaro at Sitio Basilio, Barrio San Jose, Roxas, Isabela.
- Acson was armed with a carbine and held up Lazaro at gunpoint, taking PHP 23 from him.
- The other malefactors ransacked Lazaro’s hut and took carpentry tools valued at PHP 100 and parts of a carbine.
- Grospe rode his carabao, crossed the Siffu River, alerted neighbors, and, together with Lorenzo Soriano, Saturnino Sales, Maximo Saludares, Alejandro Tuvera and Evaristo Tuvera, formed a rescue party armed with guns and bolos.
- The rescue party concealed themselves behind banana plants and engaged in a brief exchange of fire with the five malefactors.
- Acson was killed during the encounter; Evaristo Tuvera sustained a fatal gunshot wound that entered the chest, penetrated the heart and right lung, and exited in the right scapular region (Exh. A); he was the lone fatality among Grospe’s group.
- The malefactors fled in confusion and left the stolen articles at the scene; the recovered items were offered in evidence as Exhibits B to F.
- Investigation, complaint and pretrial proceedings
- The Constabulary investigated the incident; affidavits of Grospe, Lazaro, Alejandro Tuvera and Lorenzo Soriano were sworn before the municipal judge of Roxas on June 23, 1969.
- A Constabulary investigator filed a complaint for robbery in band with homicide against Barut, Ramiscal, Quebral and Agustin in the municipal court of Roxas on July 7, 1969.
- The municipal judge conducted a preliminary examination on July 16–17, 1969, interrogating Lazaro, Grospe, Soriano, Consolacion Cabutaje, and Dr. Luis R. Tamayo (the autopsy doctor).
- Arrest warrants dated July 17, 1969 were served only years later: upon Barut on December 30, 1972; upon Quebral on August 27, 1973; and upon Ramiscal on December 31, 1973.
- The municipal judge took Quebral’s statement on December 10, 1973, and took Barut’s and Ramiscal’s statements on December 31, 1973; the case was elevated to the Court of First Instance on January 9, 1974.
- The fiscal filed an information for robbery in band with homicide dated February 19, 1974.
- Trial c...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- Adequacy of the trial court’s decision to state ultimate facts
- Whether the trial court’s decision complied with statutory and constitutional requirements to state the facts proven or admitted and the grounds of the judgment.
- Competence of the Constabulary to investigate and file the complaint
- Whether membership in the Constabulary rendered the investigation and filing of the complaint infirm.
- Sufficiency and credibility of identification and alibi evidence
- Whether the positive identification by Marcelino Grospe and the recovered exhibits sufficed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
- Whether the appellants’ alibis created reasonable doubt.
- Legal characterization of the homicide vis-à-vis the robbery
- Whether the homicide of Evaristo Tuvera, occurring after the robbery and after the robbers had left the victim’s house, was nevertheless integrated with the robbery to constitute robbery with homicide under Article 294(1) of the Revised Penal Code.
- ...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)