Case Digest (G.R. No. 137000)
Facts:
On December 3, 1964, in the municipality of Nueva Era, province of Ilocos Norte, Aurelio Balisacan allegedly attacked and stabbed Leonicio Bulaoat, inflicting mortal wounds. On February 1, 1965, the Court of First Instance of Ilocos Norte charged Balisacan with homicide. Upon arraignment, he entered a plea of guilty with the assistance of counsel. At the court’s instance, he was permitted to present evidence of mitigating circumstances, during which he testified that he acted in self-defense, claiming the deceased had been strangling him, and that he voluntarily surrendered to police afterward. On March 6, 1965, relying solely on this testimony, the trial court rendered an acquittal. The People of the Philippines appealed that decision to the Court of Appeals, which, without an appellee’s brief, certified the case to the Supreme Court on July 14, 1966, as presenting questions purely of law.Issues:
- Did the trial court err in acquitting the accused despite his prior plea of gui
Case Digest (G.R. No. 137000)
Facts:
- Charging and arraignment
- On December 3, 1964, in Nueva Era, Ilocos Norte, Aurelio Balisacan stabbed Leonicio Bulaoat, causing wounds that led to the latter’s death.
- On February 1, 1965, the Court of First Instance of Ilocos Norte charged Balisacan with homicide and, upon arraignment, he pleaded guilty with assistance of counsel.
- Presentation of evidence for mitigation
- At de oficio counsel’s petition, the court allowed Balisacan to present evidence solely to establish mitigating circumstances.
- Balisacan testified he acted in self-defense—claiming the victim was strangling him—and that he voluntarily surrendered to police authorities.
- Trial court decision and appeal
- On March 6, 1965, relying on the accused’s testimony, the court a quo acquitted Balisacan.
- The prosecution appealed to the Court of Appeals (brief filed September 9, 1965). No appellee’s brief was filed.
- On July 14, 1966, the Court of Appeals certified the case to the Supreme Court as one involving questions purely of law (Sec. 17, R.A. 296), and it was docketed on August 5, 1966.
Issues:
- Whether the trial court erred in acquitting the accused despite his plea of guilty at arraignment.
- Whether the prosecution’s appeal places the accused in double jeopardy, barring the appeal under Section 2, Rule 122 of the Rules of Court.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)