Title
People vs. Baldogo
Case
G.R. No. 128106-07
Decision Date
Jan 24, 2003
Inmates Baldogo and Bermas killed Jorge Camacho and kidnapped Julie Camacho in 1996. Baldogo was convicted of Murder and Kidnapping, sentenced to reclusion perpetua, with damages awarded to victims' families.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 128889)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Charges and Indictments
    • Criminal Case No. 12900 – Murder of Jorge Camacho on February 22, 1996 at the residence of the Camacho family inside Iwahig Prison and Penal Farm, Puerto Princesa City. The Information alleged conspiracy with treachery, evident premeditation, use of a bolo, and recidivism.
    • Criminal Case No. 12903 – Kidnapping and serious illegal detention of Julie E. Camacho, 12 years old, from the same residence on February 22, 1996, and detention in the mountains for more than five days, with recidivism alleged.
  • Antecedent and Commission of the Offenses
    • The Camacho family (father Julio Sr., mother Heather, and children Jorge (14), Julie (12), and Jasper (8)) lived inside the penal farm. Inmates Edgardo Bermas (“Bunso”) and Gonzalo Baldogo (“Baguio”) were assigned as domestic helpers, residing in a hut 10 meters from the Camacho house.
    • On the evening of February 22, 1996, after dinner:
      • Bermas and Baldogo went to the kitchen; Julie heard a cry, ran in, and saw Jorge sprawled, bloodied, while both helpers stood over him armed with bolos.
      • As Julie fled, Baldogo tied and gagged her; both men dragged her toward nearby mountains, joined later by Bermas with provisions. They spent the night and detained Julie until February 28. Julie escaped on her own and was rescued by local authorities. Jorge’s body was taken to the hospital and pronounced dead; autopsy revealed multiple stab wounds and a lacerated neck.
  • Trial Proceedings
    • The two cases were consolidated. Prosecution presented four witnesses (Julie, Dr. Edilberto Joaquin, Esteban Mamites, Julio Camacho Sr.) and documentary/object evidence (autopsy report, prison records).
    • Baldogo denied participation, claimed duress by Bermas, and testified that Bermas alone committed the crimes and forced his cooperation under threat of death. He asserted he protected Julie and released her when his foot healed.

Issues:

  • Whether the evidence proved Baldogo’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt for murder and kidnapping.
  • Whether the trial court erred in rejecting Baldogo’s defenses of denial and duress.
  • Whether the aggravating circumstances of evident premeditation, abuse of superior strength, and quasi-recidivism were sufficiently proven.
  • Whether the imposition of the death penalty for the murder conviction was proper.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.