Title
People vs. Argayan y Ognayon
Case
G.R. No. 255750
Decision Date
Jan 30, 2023
Diane Argayan convicted of parricide for killing her 3-year-old daughter, Jeana, through multiple stab and hack wounds; Supreme Court affirmed conviction based on extrajudicial confession, circumstantial evidence, and credible testimony.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 179382)

Facts:

  • Parties and Charge
    • The People of the Philippines (plaintiff-appellee) charged Diane Argayan y Ognayon (accused-appellant) with parricide by Information dated July 7, 2014.
    • The Information alleged that on May 26, 2014, at Tiwitiw, Banangan, Sablan, Benguet, Diane willfully stabbed her daughter Jeana Rose Argayan Mangili, inflicting multiple fatal wounds.
  • Trial Proceedings
    • Diane pleaded not guilty upon arraignment; trial on the merits ensued after pre-trial.
    • Prosecution presented testimony of six-year-old Raven Rhyzl Cha-ong, who witnessed her cousin Jeana bleeding with a knife in her back, and who identified Diane as the assailant.
    • Scene investigators documented broken bottles, photographed the crime scene, and collected evidence.
    • Medico-legal officer Dr. Jaime Rodrigo Leal conducted autopsy revealing six hack wounds on the head and seven stab wounds on the back; cause of death was hemorrhagic shock.
    • Raven’s sworn statement described the kitchen knife with a black handle as the weapon.
    • Social Welfare Officer Girlie Willie testified that Diane, in private counseling sessions, admitted killing her daughter.
    • Diane waived her right to present defense evidence.
  • Lower Court Decisions
    • The RTC (Branch 9, La Trinidad, Benguet) found all elements of parricide proven, credited Raven’s testimony, and held Diane of sound mind. It sentenced her to reclusion perpetua and awarded civil, moral, and exemplary damages of PHP 75,000 each, plus interest.
    • On appeal, the Court of Appeals (Second Division) affirmed the RTC, emphasizing Raven’s consistent testimony, Diane’s conduct at the scene, and her extrajudicial admission as corroborative evidence.
  • Supreme Court Proceedings
    • Diane elevated the case to the Supreme Court, arguing lack of direct evidence that she killed Jeana and inadmissibility of her unwritten admission.
    • The Office of the Solicitor General maintained that the prosecution proved all elements and that Diane’s extrajudicial confession complied with constitutional safeguards and was admissible.

Issues:

  • Whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming Diane’s conviction for parricide given the absence of direct evidence and the allegedly inadmissible extrajudicial admission.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.