Title
People vs. Ansano y Calleja
Case
G.R. No. 232455
Decision Date
Dec 2, 2020
Accused acquitted of raping a minor due to unreliable identification; Supreme Court found reasonable doubt in prosecution's evidence, emphasizing presumption of innocence.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 232455)

Facts:

  • Parties and Procedural History
    • The People of the Philippines filed an Information on April 6, 2005 against Teodoro Ansano y Calleja for rape of minor AAA (born September 14, 1991; age 13 at incident), armed with a bolo, by force and intimidation.
    • RTC of YYY, ZZZ, Branch 26 rendered judgment on November 16, 2015 finding Ansano guilty beyond reasonable doubt and sentencing him to reclusion perpetua plus damages.
    • On February 20, 2017, the CA in CA-G.R. CR-HC No. 08223 affirmed with modifications (increased damages), prompting Ansano’s appeal to the Supreme Court.
  • Prosecution Evidence
    • AAA’s testimony: on April 6, 2005 at about 5:00 PM near the river in [XXX], Ansano, carrying a bolo and wearing farm clothes, threatened her, led her to a secluded bamboo area, forced her to perform oral sex, then committed vaginal rape twice, and warned her not to tell anyone.
    • Identification: she first “recognized” Ansano during a drinking spree with her father on March 19, 2006, noting a scar, “butil-butil” on face, moustache, and slanted eyes; she later confirmed his identity via a single photograph shown at the municipal hall.
    • Medico-legal report by Dr. Maria Cheryl Obcemea (exam on April 7, 2005) indicated multiple fresh lacerations of the hymen at 7 and 5 o’clock positions, with minimal bleeding.
  • Defense Evidence
    • Ansano’s denial and alibi: claimed he was at Villa Pokan swimming with friends on April 6, 2005 at around 5:00 PM, went home thereafter, and slept until the next morning; asserted he did not know AAA.
    • No scar on accused’s face: defense counsel and presiding judge verified in open court during testimony that Ansano bore no facial scar.

Issues:

  • Did the RTC and CA err in convicting Ansano of rape?
  • Was the victim’s identification of Ansano as the perpetrator proven beyond reasonable doubt?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.