Title
People vs. Adriano y Samson
Case
G.R. No. 205228
Decision Date
Jul 15, 2015
A 2007 shooting in Nueva Ecija led to two deaths; Adriano convicted for murder and homicide despite alibi, affirmed by the Supreme Court.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 125838)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Procedural History
    • Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Gapan City, Nueva Ecija, Branch 36, convicted Rolly Adriano y Samson for:
      • Homicide (Crim. Case No. 13159-07) for the killing of Ofelia Bulanan.
      • Murder (Crim. Case No. 13160-07) for the killing of Danilo Cabiedes.
    • Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR-HC No. 04028 affirmed the RTC decision on 30 May 2011.
    • The Supreme Court consolidated the appeal and promulgated its decision on 15 July 2015.
  • Incident Description
    • On March 13, 2007 at around 8 a.m. along Olongapo-Gapan National Road, Barangay Malapit, San Isidro, Nueva Ecija, a blue Toyota Corolla (plate WHK 635) overtook a maroon Honda CRV (plate CTL 957) occupied by Danilo Cabiedes.
    • The front-seat passenger of the Corolla fired shots at the CRV, causing it to swerve into a canal. Four armed men then shot Cabiedes; a stray bullet struck bystander Ofelia Bulanan.
    • Bulanan died on the spot (head wound); Cabiedes was pronounced dead on arrival at Good Samaritan General Hospital (three gunshot wounds to the chest).
  • Investigation and Arrest
    • The Corolla was registered to Antonio Y. Rivera, who admitted leasing it to Adriano. Police Officers 1 and 2, Matthew Garabiles and Alejandro Santos, positively identified Adriano as one of the assailants.
    • Adriano was arrested later that day at Rivera’s shop; the PSOG headquarters recovered one deformed bullet and five .45-caliber cartridges.
    • Defense alibi: Adriano claimed he was in Dolores, Magalang, Pampanga, washing clothes, fetching motorcycle repairs, visiting friends, and watching cockfights between 6 a.m. and 5 p.m.; corroborated by four relatives/friends.

Issues:

  • Whether Adriano’s defense of alibi was sufficiently proven to create reasonable doubt.
  • Whether minor inconsistencies in the testimonies of PO1 Garabiles and PO2 Santos undermine their positive identification of Adriano.
  • Whether the killings constitute a complex crime or separate offenses, and whether qualifying circumstances were properly appreciated.
  • Whether the computation and quantum of actual, moral, exemplary, and temperate damages awarded are correct.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.