Title
People vs. Adoviso
Case
G.R. No. 116196-97
Decision Date
Jun 23, 1999
Two men were shot and killed in a camalig in 1990; eyewitnesses identified Pablo Adoviso as the assailant, despite his alibi claim, leading to his murder conviction.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 116196-97)

Facts:

  • Procedural Background
    • Appellant Pablo Adoviso was charged with two counts of Murder in Criminal Case Nos. P-2079 (Rufino Agunos) and P-2080 (Emeterio Vasquez) before RTC Branch 31, Camarines Sur.
    • The informations allege that on February 18, 1990 at about 8:00 PM in Sitio Tan-agan, Barangay Casugad, Bula, Camarines Sur, appellant and four unnamed companions, armed with long firearms, conspired to kill the victims with evident premeditation and treachery.
  • Prosecution Evidence
    • Eyewitness Testimonies
      • Bonifacio Vasquez hid about eight meters away behind a coconut tree, saw appellant unmasked, recognized him by build and long hair, and witnessed him fire a sack-wrapped long firearm at both victims under gas-lamp illumination inside the bamboo camalig.
      • Elmer Vasquez saw five armed men (four masked, one unmasked—appellant), observed the shooting through bamboo slats, and fled after being fired upon.
    • Scene Description
      • Two adjacent structures: a camalig (elevated bamboo hut with horizontal slats) and a nearby house eight meters away.
      • Illumination by a gas lamp placed inside the camalig and another lamp carried by Emeterio as he descended the stairs.
    • Medical Certification
Dr. Janice Nanette Estrada certified multiple fatal gunshot wounds on Rufino (inguinal area, sacral area, thigh, abdomen) and Emeterio (paraumbilical area, lumbar area, hypogastrium, forearms, arms).
  • Defense Evidence
    • Alibi
Appellant claimed he spent February 18, 1990 from 7:00 PM until past 11:00 PM in Sitio Burabod, Barangay Palsong—about 1 km away—drinking in Honoria Tragante’s store with Francisco Bislombre, Benjamin Alina Jr., and PFC Antero Esteron.
  • Denial and Polygraph
    • Police certification by Pfc. Ramon N. Canabe stated the assailants were “unidentified armed men.”
    • NBI Examiner Ernesto Lucena’s polygraph report showed no deception reactions on appellant’s part.
  • Trial Court Decision
    • On March 25, 1994, RTC Branch 31 rendered Joint Judgment finding appellant guilty beyond reasonable doubt of two counts of Murder with treachery.
    • Penalties imposed: reclusion perpetua for each count; ₱50,000 civil indemnity to each victim’s heirs; accessory penalties and costs.

Issues:

  • Eyewitness Identification
    • Whether positive identification under nighttime conditions with gas-lamp illumination and bamboo slats was credible.
    • Whether prior acquaintance between appellant and witnesses affected reliability.
  • Alibi and Other Exculpatory Evidence
    • Whether appellant’s alibi sufficiently proved physical impossibility of his presence at the crime scene.
    • Whether the police certification and polygraph results should exonerate appellant.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.