Title
People vs. Bingky Campos and Danny "Boy" Acabo
Case
G.R. No. 176061
Decision Date
Jul 4, 2011
Bingky and Danny appealed their conviction for murder, claiming self-defense. The Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts' decisions, rejecting the self-defense claim based on evidence and testimony.

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-49162)

Facts:

  • The Crime and Charges
    • The appellants, Bingky Campos and Danny "Boy" Acabo, were charged with murder for stabbing Romeo F. Abad, 64 years old, on August 19, 2001 around 8:00 PM at Arellano Street, Poblacion Zamboanguita, Negros Oriental.
    • The stabbing inflicted critical injuries on Romeo's liver, gallbladder, duodenum, and pancreas, causing his death the following day at Holy Child Hospital.
    • The appellants were charged under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code for murder qualified by treachery.
  • Initial Proceedings
    • Bingky and Danny pleaded not guilty at arraignment on September 25, 2001.
    • The case underwent pre-trial and proceeded to trial.
  • Prosecution's Version
    • Eyewitness Lester Huck Baldivino testified seeing Romeo buy cigarettes and candies and engage in casual conversation before appellant Danny suddenly stabbed him with a plamingko (a bladed weapon) while Bingky stood nearby.
    • Danny and Bingky immediately fled after the attack.
    • The medical evidence showed a fatal stab wound causing massive internal injuries and hypovolemic shock resulting in death.
  • Defense's Version
    • Danny and Bingky claimed they were attacked by four unknown men while on their way to their uncle's house.
    • The appellants contended that Danny stabbed one of the men in self-defense after being kicked and held by the attackers.
    • They denied any involvement or conspiracy to kill Romeo and stated that Romeo was not among their attackers.
  • Trial Court and Court of Appeals Decisions
    • The RTC found the appellants guilty beyond reasonable doubt and sentenced them to reclusion perpetua, ordering indemnity and damages to the heirs.
    • The CA affirmed the RTC decision in entirety.
  • Appeal to the Supreme Court
    • The appellants asserted the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and invoked self-defense.
    • The prosecution reiterated the sufficiency of evidence including eyewitness testimony and established conspiracy.

Issues:

  • Whether the appellants' guilt for murder was proven beyond reasonable doubt.
  • Whether the appellants validly invoked the justifying circumstance of self-defense.
  • Whether conspiracy existed between Bingky and Danny in the killing of Romeo.
  • Whether the presence of treachery qualified the killing to murder.
  • The proper penalty and awards of damages.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.