Title
Supreme Court
People vs. YYY
Case
G.R. No. 262941
Decision Date
Feb 20, 2024
YYY was convicted for child pornography involving her niece, utilizing a computer system to exploit minors, leading to a harsh sentence and fines.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 143313)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Antecedents
    • July 13, 2016 – FBI traced accused’s emails, discovered nude photos of minor girls for sale, identified location in Angeles City, Pampanga; undercover chat ensued where accused offered child pornography and proposed sexual meet-up.
    • July 27, 2016 – US Embassy Legal Attaché informed PNP; PNP’s Col. Tuliao tasked PSI Gallano to verify report; surveillance on August 6, 2016 found minor girls, a computer with webcam, vibrator, children’s panties matching FBI photos.
  • Search Warrant and Execution
    • August 11, 2016 – Col. Tuliao applied for warrant before RTC Judge Pamular, supported by surveillance reports and FBI letter; warrant described house address and 17 categories of items (computers, storage devices, sex toys, clothing, receipts, vehicle).
    • August 16, 2016 – Police and barangay officials served warrant; inventoried ECS-marked items (computer set, modem, receipts, vibrator, cellphone, clear book, etc.); rescued three minors (AAA, BBB, CCC) and turned them over to DSWD.
  • Investigation, Trial and Appeals
    • Digital forensic exam retrieved nude images/videos of AAA and chat logs about sale; interviews with AAA recounted forced nudity and sexual acts before the webcam.
    • September 2017 – Information filed for violations of RA 9775 §§ 4(a),(b),(c) in relation to § 16, and RA 10175 § 4(c)(2); accused pleaded not guilty, claimed fabrication and illegal entry.
    • July 9, 2020 – RTC convicted accused of child pornography with use of computer, sentenced to reclusion perpetua, fined ₱2,000,000, awarded moral (₱50,000) and exemplary (₱100,000) damages.
    • February 28, 2022 – CA affirmed conviction, held Information date allegation and search warrant valid; denied accused’s claims of defect and illegality in search.

Issues:

  • Evidence and Credibility
    • Whether the minor victim’s testimony and digital evidence sufficiently proved elements of child pornography.
    • Whether accused’s denial defense undermines conviction.
  • Information and Warrant
    • Whether the Information was defective for lack of precise date.
    • Whether the search warrant was validly issued and executed.
  • Repeal of RA 9775
    • Whether the enactment of RA 11930, which repealed RA 9775 without a saving clause but reenacted similar offenses, extinguished criminal liability.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.