Title
Supreme Court
People vs. XXX62846
Case
G.R. No. 262846
Decision Date
Feb 18, 2025
A father was convicted of rape and unjust vexation against his daughter, with the decision affirming the penalties imposed and modifying the charge of attempted rape to a conviction for the same.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 262846)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background
    • Accused-appellant XXX262846 (father) charged under two Informations before RTC Branch 26, Medina, Misamis Oriental:
      • F.C. Crim. Case No. 065-M (2013) for rape under Article 266-A(1) in relation to Article 266-B of the RPC, amended by RA 8353.
      • F.C. Crim. Case No. 066-M (2013) for attempted rape under Articles 266-A, 266-B, 6 and 51 of the RPC.
    • Victim AAA262846, then 16-year-old daughter and first-year college student, lived with accused; mother was overseas worker.
  • First Incident (First Week, January 2013)
    • Around 11:00 p.m., AAA262846 asleep when accused kicked her, pulled her hair, covered her mouth, pulled down her shorts and underwear, touched her breasts, and inserted his penis into her vagina.
    • AAA262846 could not cry out; accused threatened to kill her family if she resisted; he then left to sleep.
  • Second Incident (Last Week, January 2013)
    • At midnight, AAA262846 found her shorts removed and accused exposing himself, preparing to mount her.
    • She bent her knee, hit his stomach, causing him to desist; accused threatened her support and freedom.
  • Disclosure and Evidence
    • AAA262846 confided in friends and brother when accused left for work on February 10, 2013; they reported to police and grandmother.
    • Medical exam (Feb. 12, 2013) by Dr. Analiza B. Bajan: healed complete hymenal laceration at 7 o’clock; healed partial lacerations at 1, 5, 11 o’clock—penetration confirmed.
  • Defense and Alibi
    • Accused denied and claimed he was in Cagayan de Oro boarding house throughout January 2013.
    • Witnesses YYY262846 and ZZZ262846 testified to his alleged continuous absence from family home.
  • Lower Courts’ Decisions
    • RTC (June 26, 2018):
      • Convicted rape—reclusion perpetua + PHP 100,000 civil indemnity, moral and exemplary damages each.
      • Downgraded attempted rape to unjust vexation—30 days arresto menor + PHP 10,000 civil indemnity.
    • CA (Jan. 26, 2021): Affirmed RTC decision in all respects.
    • Supreme Court appeal filed by accused.

Issues:

  • Whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming XXX262846’s conviction for rape under Article 266-A(1) of the RPC.
  • Whether the CA erred in affirming the conviction for unjust vexation instead of attempted rape under Article 266-A(1) and related provisions.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.