Title
Palaganas vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 165483
Decision Date
Sep 12, 2006
A karaoke dispute over "My Way" escalated into a fatal shooting, resulting in homicide and frustrated homicide charges. The Supreme Court affirmed guilt, citing an unlicensed firearm as a special aggravating circumstance, and adjusted penalties and damages accordingly.

Case Digest (A.M. No. 2440-CFI)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Charges
    • Petitioner: Rujjeric Z. Palaganas (also “Rojeric”), charged with Murder, two counts of Frustrated Murder, and illegal firearm possession under COMELEC Resolution No. 2958 (Omnibus Election Code).
    • Co-accused: Ferdinand Z. Palaganas, arraigned separately; later acquitted by RTC.
  • Shooting Incident (January 16, 1998)
    • Venue: Tidbits Café-Videoke Bar, Poblacion, Manaoag, Pangasinan. Victims were three Ferrer brothers—Servillano Jr., Melton (“Tony”), and Michael (“Boying”)—drinking and singing.
    • Initial Altercation: Jaime Palaganas sang “My Way”; Melton Ferrer joined mockingly. Jaime struck Servillano with a microphone, triggering a rumble.
    • Stone-throwing and Shooting: The Ferrer brothers pursued Ferdinand out of the bar. Outside, Ferdinand allegedly pointed at the Ferrers and said to petitioner, “They are the ones, shoot them.” Petitioner fired a warning shot, then fatally shot Melton and wounded Servillano and Michael.
  • Procedural History
    • RTC Decision (Oct. 28, 1998): Convicted petitioner of Homicide (Art. 249, RPC) for Melton’s death and two counts of Frustrated Homicide (Arts. 6, 50 & 249, RPC) for wounds to Servillano and Michael; acquitted him of the COMELEC offense; acquitted Ferdinand of all charges.
    • Court of Appeals (Sept. 30, 2004): Affirmed with modification—applied voluntary surrender mitigation and Indeterminate Sentence Law; adjusted penalties and damages.
    • Supreme Court Review: Petitioner filed Rule 45 petition raising errors in affirmation of conviction and denial of self-defense.

Issues:

  • Did the Court of Appeals err in affirming the convictions for Homicide and Frustrated Homicide?
  • Should petitioner be acquitted on the ground of lawful self-defense?
  • Was the wound inflicted on Michael properly classified as Frustrated Homicide or should it be Attempted Homicide?
  • Is the use of an unlicensed firearm a generic or special aggravating circumstance, and how does it affect sentencing under the Indeterminate Sentence Law?
  • What are the correct penalties and civil damages given the applicable aggravating and mitigating circumstances?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.