Title
Padilla vs. Globe Asiatique Realty Holdings Corp.
Case
G.R. No. 207376
Decision Date
Aug 6, 2014
PNB sued Globe Asiatique for fraud over P1.2B loan defaults; Pasig RTC dismissed Globe's damages suit but refused to hear PNB's counterclaims. SC ruled counterclaims must proceed independently, emphasizing judicial efficiency and avoiding multiplicity of suits.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-21438)

Facts:

  • CTS Facility Agreements and Deeds of Assignment
    • From 2005 to 2008, Philippine National Bank (PNB) entered into Contracts to Sell (CTS) Facility Agreements with Globe Asiatique Realty Holdings Corporation and Filmal Realty Corporation, represented by Delfin S. Lee and Dexter L. Lee, to finance subdivision house receivables. Initial facility of ₱200 million was increased to ₱1.2 billion.
    • As collateral, respondents executed Deeds of Assignment over receivables totaling ₱1,195,926,390.72 in consideration of releases totaling ₱1,395,665,564.69.
  • Default and Pasay RTC Proceedings
    • In early 2010, respondents defaulted on payments and failed to deliver titles; PNB declared default and demanded ₱974,377,159.10. An investigation revealed 231 of 240 Contracts to Sell were fictitious or defective.
    • PNB filed Civil Case No. R-PSY-10-04228-CV in the RTC of Pasay City for recovery of money and damages, praying for a writ of preliminary attachment. The court granted the attachment (Aug. 25–27, 2010).
    • Defendants filed answers with compulsory counterclaims and motions to dismiss and to discharge attachment; the RTC denied these motions (Apr. 29, 2011) and set hearings on summary judgment and other motions.
  • Pasig RTC Damage Suit
    • On August 10, 2011, Globe Asiatique, Filmal and the Lees sued Judge Pedro De Leon Gutierrez and Aida Padilla in RTC of Pasig City (Civil Case No. 73132) for moral, exemplary and litigation damages, alleging malicious prosecution, perjured affidavit and insufficient bond.
    • Judge Gutierrez moved to dismiss for lack of cause and jurisdiction; Padilla answered with compulsory counterclaims and raised forum shopping, litis pendentia, and failure to state a claim.
    • RTC of Pasig City dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction (Apr. 2, 2012), denied Padilla’s motion to set counterclaims for pre-trial (Nov. 12, 2012), and denied reconsideration (May 8, 2013).
  • Supreme Court Petition
    • Padilla filed a Rule 45 petition for review on certiorari, raising whether a court may entertain a compulsory counterclaim when the corresponding complaint was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Issues:

  • Whether the dismissal of the plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of jurisdiction in the Pasig RTC automatically precludes the court from hearing a compulsory counterclaim pleaded by the defendant.
  • Whether Aida Padilla’s resort to a Rule 45 petition was the proper mode of review.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.