Title
Padilla vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 121917
Decision Date
Mar 12, 1997
Robin Padilla convicted for illegal possession of firearms after a lawful arrest; Supreme Court upheld conviction but reduced penalty due to insufficient evidence of permits.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 121917)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Seizure and Charge
    • On October 26, 1992, private citizen Enrique Manarang witnessed a hit-and-run by a Mitsubishi Pajero (plate PMA 777) and reported it via radio to the PNP Angeles City.
    • The fleeing vehicle was intercepted at Abacan Bridge by SPO2 Borja and SPO2 Miranda; driver was identified as Robin Cariao Padilla (@ “Robinhood” Padilla).
    • Upon arrest, police observed in Padilla’s person and vehicle:
      • One .357 Smith & Wesson revolver with six live rounds;
      • One M-16 Baby Armalite rifle with magazines and live ammunition;
      • One .380 Pietro Beretta pistol with clip and eight live rounds;
      • Additional magazines and ammunitions.
    • Padilla had no permit or license covering these firearms; PNP Firearms & Explosives Office certifications confirmed no registration under his name.
  • Trial Court Proceedings
    • RTC Angeles City charged Padilla with illegal possession of firearms and ammunitions under P.D. 1866. Warrant of arrest issued; bail set at ₱200,000.
    • Padilla pleaded not guilty, waived presence at proceedings.
    • On April 25, 1994, RTC convicted him, imposing an indeterminate penalty of 17 years, 4 months, 1 day (minimum) to 21 years reclusion perpetua (maximum).
  • Court of Appeals
    • Padilla appealed to CA (G.R. CR-16040). On July 21, 1995, CA affirmed conviction, canceled bail bond, ordered immediate arrest and remand.
    • Padilla’s motion for reconsideration was denied on September 20, 1995.
  • Supreme Court Proceedings
    • On September 28, 1995, Padilla filed a petition for review on certiorari with multiple supplemental motions and bail applications.
    • Solicitor-General initially opposed bail but later filed a “Manifestation In Lieu Of Comment” praying for acquittal.
    • The Court resolved the petition on March 12, 1997, considering the entirety of records and briefs.

Issues:

  • Whether Padilla’s warrantless arrest and subsequent seizure of firearms and ammunitions were lawful and the evidence admissible.
  • Whether Padilla was lawfully authorized by a Mission Order and Memorandum Receipt to carry the subject firearms.
  • Whether the penalty under P.D. 1866 for simple illegal possession of firearms is cruel, excessive or unconstitutional.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.