Title
Supreme Court
PadierNo.y Quejada vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 181111
Decision Date
Aug 17, 2015
Petitioners took a truck loaded with illegal lumber to suppress evidence, acquitted as accessories but convicted for obstruction of justice under P.D. 1829.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 158150)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Procedural History
    • Petitioners: Jackson Padiernos y Quejada, Jackie Roxas y German, and Rolando Mesina y Javate.
    • Charged by Information in RTC, Branch 66, Baler, Aurora, as accessories to illegal possession of lumber under P.D. 705, for “taking and carrying away” a ten-wheeler truck (Plate No. TFZ-747) to prevent its use as evidence and avoid confiscation.
  • Prosecution Evidence
    • November 15, 2002 in Caragsacan, Dingalan, Aurora: DENR Officer Felimon Balico inspected a parked truck loaded with 818 pieces of lumber (10,253 board feet) without permits; reported to SPO4 Ramil Gamboa and SPO4 Romulo Derit. Lumber unloaded and kept under guard; truck remained parked under DENRO and police watch.
    • November 16, 2002: Petitioners Padiernos, Roxas, and Mesina, with Santiago Castillo (owner) and others, agreed to move the truck to the police station. Mesina drove; petitioners and DENROs boarded; instead of station, vehicle sped toward Nueva Ecija. Police gave chase and fired warning shots; Philippine Army blocked road at Brgy. Bagting, Gabaldon, NE. Truck stopped; petitioners Padiernos and Roxas insulted DENROs; police recovered truck and returned to Dingalan.
  • Defense Evidence
    • Mesina and Roxas testified they were asked by Santiago to drive the truck to Cabanatuan, assured no problem existed; they only learned of its confiscation upon arrival.
    • Padiernos testified he merely hitched a ride and did not hear police warnings or DENROs’ shouts due to noisy engine and broken mirrors; petitioners split ways after Army interception.
  • Lower Courts’ Decisions
    • RTC (Crim. Case No. 3122): Convicted petitioners as accessories to P.D. 705—finding common design, prior knowledge of illegal transport, credible prosecution witnesses, and rejection of petitioners’ denial.
    • CA (CA-G.R. CR No. 28920): Affirmed RTC’s factual findings; treated truck as “instrument” under RPC Art. 19(2); held that, notwithstanding mala prohibita nature of P.D. 705, petitioners’ knowledge sufficed; modified penalties.

Issues:

  • Accessory Liability under P.D. 705 and RPC Art. 19(2)
    • Whether petitioners can be held accessories for illegal possession of lumber when they took the truck after discovery and confiscation of the lumber.
    • Whether their acts satisfy the element of preventing discovery of the crime as required by Art. 19(2).
  • Alternative Criminal Liability under P.D. 1829
    • Whether petitioners’ act of taking and carrying away the truck constitutes obstruction of justice under Section 1(b) of P.D. 1829.
    • Whether the prosecution proved knowledge, intent, and suppression of evidence elements.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.