Case Digest (G.R. No. 220940) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
This case involves Atty. Rodolfo D. Pactolin, a Sangguniang Panlalawigan member of Misamis Occidental, who was convicted of falsification of a public document. The incident began in May 1996 when Elmer Abastillas, coach of the Ozamis City volleyball team, requested financial assistance amounting to ₱10,000 from Mayor Benjamin A. Fuentes. The Mayor approved this request and designated Mario R. Ferraren, a city council member, as Officer-in-Charge during his absence. Atty. Pactolin obtained a photocopy of Abastillas' letter and, on June 24, 1996, filed a complaint against Ferraren with the Office of the Deputy Ombudsman-Mindanao, alleging illegal disbursement of public funds. Accompanying the complaint was a falsified version of Abastillas’ letter, which falsely implicated Ferraren as the approving authority. Ferraren filed a complaint for falsification against Pactolin before the Sandiganbayan. On November 12, 2003, the Sandiganbayan found Pactolin guilty under Article 172 of the... Case Digest (G.R. No. 220940) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Background and Initial Request
- In May 1996, Elmer Abastillas, playing coach of the Ozamis City volleyball team, requested financial assistance of P10,000 from Mayor Benjamin A. Fuentes of Ozamis City.
- Mayor Fuentes approved and directed the City Treasurer to process the disbursement.
- Mayor Fuentes designated city council member Mario R. Ferraren as Officer-in-Charge (OIC) while he was away.
- Abastillas received the P10,000 assistance for the volleyball team.
- Complaint Filed by Atty. Rodolfo D. Pactolin
- Respondent Atty. Rodolfo D. Pactolin, then a provincial board member, obtained a photocopy of Abastillas's letter.
- On June 24, 1996, Pactolin filed a complaint with the Office of the Deputy Ombudsman-Mindanao against Ferraren for illegal disbursement, attaching a copy of a purportedly falsified letter indicating Ferraren (not Mayor Fuentes) approved the disbursement.
- Legal Proceedings and Conviction
- Ferraren filed a complaint with the Sandiganbayan against Pactolin for falsification of public documents (Criminal Case 25665).
- On November 12, 2003, the Sandiganbayan found Pactolin guilty of falsification under Article 172 of the Revised Penal Code.
- The penalty imposed was imprisonment from 2 years and 4 months to 4 years, 9 months and 10 days, plus accessory penalties and a fine of P5,000.
- Pactolin appealed to the Supreme Court, which on May 20, 2008, affirmed the conviction in G.R. No. 161455.
- Administrative Proceedings and Referral to IBP
- The Supreme Court referred the case as an administrative complaint against Pactolin under Rule 139-B of the Rules of Court to the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) for appropriate disciplinary action.
- Ferraren did not participate in the IBP proceedings; the IBP Board of Governors ultimately dismissed the case on October 9, 2010, citing insufficiency of evidence.
Issues:
- Whether the conviction by final judgment of a crime involving moral turpitude, specifically falsification of public documents, is a sufficient ground for disbarment under Section 27, Rule 138 of the Rules of Court.
- Whether Atty. Rodolfo D. Pactolin should be disbarred following his conviction for falsification.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)