G.R. No. L-14500 - Pachoco vs. Tumangday

Ask AI

G.R. No. L-14500: Pachoco vs. Tumangday

Getting related questions...
What do you want to know about the case?
Your conversations and searches stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. To know more about our privacy commitment see jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Pachoco vs. Tumangday

Case: G.R. No. L-14500

Decision Date: May 25, 1960

Quirina Pachoco, convicted of slight physical injuries, contested Agripina Tumangday's civil damages claim, arguing res judicata. The Supreme Court ruled that civil actions under Article 33 are independent of criminal cases, allowing Tumangday's claim to proceed, and dismissed Pachoco's petition as appeal was an adequate remedy.

res judicata

civil action for damages

certiorari and prohibition

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-14500)
Detailed Concise

Full Text Too Short for AI Analysis

Unlock Full Case Digest

END

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-14500) Detailed Concise

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-14500) Detailed Concise

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-14500)
Detailed Concise

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-14500)
Detailed Concise