Case Digest (G.R. No. 118910)
Facts:
In A.C. No. 10179 formerly CBD 11-2985, decided on March 4, 2014, the Supreme Court En Banc reviewed a disbarment complaint filed by Benjamin Q. Ong against Atty. William F. Delos Santos. In January 2008, Sheriff Fernando Mercado introduced Ong to Atty. Delos Santos at the Metropolitan Trial Court of Manila. After developing a personal friendship, Ong agreed on January 29, 2008 to lend the lawyer ₱100,000.00 in exchange for Metrobank Check No. 0110268, postdated February 29, 2008. The respondent had represented that he was financially sound due to his “lucrative practice” and reputable clientele. Upon presentment, the check was dishonored for “account closed.” Ong promptly demanded payment, but Atty. Delos Santos ignored all collection efforts. Ong then filed a criminal complaint for estafa and violation of Batas Pambansa Blg. 22, and lodged an administrative complaint with the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP), docketed as CBD Case No. 11-2985. The IBP Bar Commissioner fo...Case Digest (G.R. No. 118910)
Facts:
- Factual Background
- In January 2008, Benjamin Q. Ong was introduced to Atty. William F. Delos Santos by Sheriff Fernando Mercado. They later became acquaintances and Ong agreed to lend the lawyer P100,000.00.
- In exchange, Atty. Delos Santos gave Ong Metrobank Check No. 0110268 postdated February 29, 2008, representing it would be funded based on his professed financial stability.
- Upon presentment, the check bounced due to a closed account. Ong notified Atty. Delos Santos, who ignored demands for payment.
- Procedural History
- Ong filed a criminal complaint for estafa and violation of Batas Pambansa Blg. 22, and separately lodged a disbarment complaint before the IBP (CBD Case No. 11-2985).
- The IBP Bar Commissioner found the dishonored check proven, noted the lawyer’s failure to answer, and recommended suspension for two years plus restitution of P100,000.00.
- The IBP Board of Governors, via Resolution No. XX-2013-253 (March 20, 2013), adopted the recommendation but increased the suspension to three years and ordered return of the loan with interest.
Issues:
- Whether the issuance of a worthless check by Atty. Delos Santos constitutes a violation of Canon 1, Rule 1.01 (“unlawful, dishonest, immoral or deceitful conduct”) and Canon 7, Rule 7.03 (“conduct that adversely reflects on fitness to practice law”) of the Code of Professional Responsibility.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)