Title
Office of the Court Administrator vs. Cabrera-Faller
Case
A.M. No. RTJ-11-2301, RTJ-11-2302, 12-9-188-RTC
Decision Date
Jan 16, 2018
Judicial audit revealed gross irregularities in RTC Dasmariñas and Imus, Cavite, including delayed case actions, improper summons service, and lapses in annulment cases. Judges and personnel held administratively liable for neglect and non-compliance.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 174238)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Judicial Audit Findings (A.M. No. RTJ-11-2301)
    • A judicial audit was conducted at RTC Dasmariñas, Cavite, Branch 90, from September 15-17, 2010.
    • The court had a total caseload of 827 cases (417 criminal, 410 civil).
    • Criminal Cases: Three cases were not acted upon for a considerable time, with the last action dating back to 2008-2009.
    • Civil Cases:
      • 106 cases were not acted upon since filing, some dating back to 2008.
      • 51 cases had no action for a considerable time, with the last action in 35 cases dating back to 2003-2009.
      • 28 cases had pending incidents, mostly filed in 2010.
      • 17 cases were submitted for decision, with one case pending since December 2008.
    • Case Management Issues:
      • Case records were not stitched, chronologically arranged, or paginated.
      • Court personnel were not wearing prescribed uniforms.
  • Irregularities in Annulment and Nullity of Marriage Cases:
    • Improper Service of Summons: Process Server Pontejos made substituted service of summons without complying with mandatory requirements.
    • No Appearance by the Solicitor General: Nine cases proceeded without the Solicitor General’s appearance.
    • No Collusion Report: In 10 cases, no collusion report was submitted by the public prosecutor.
    • No Pretrial Briefs: Missing in 11 cases at the trial stage and three submitted for decision.
    • No Formal Offer of Evidence: Two cases were submitted for decision without formal offers of evidence.
    • Missing Minutes: Minutes of hearings were not attached to several case records.
    • Irregular Psychological Reports: Some reports were photocopies, unsigned, or undated.
  • A.M. No. RTJ-11-2302:
    • Stemmed from a judicial audit conducted on February 3-11, 2011, involving RTC Imus, Cavite, Branches 20, 21, and 22, and RTC Dasmariñas 90.
    • Similar irregularities were found, including improper service of summons and lack of collusion reports.
  • A.M. No. 12-9-188-RTC:
    • An anonymous complaint alleged irregularities in Civil Case No. 1998-08 for nullity of marriage handled by Judge Cabrera-Faller.

Issues:

  • Whether Judge Cabrera-Faller, OIC Suluen, and Process Server Pontejos committed gross irregularities in handling cases, particularly in petitions for annulment and nullity of marriage.
  • Whether the respondents failed to comply with the Court’s directives to address the irregularities identified in the judicial audit.
  • Whether the irregularities in the service of summons, collusion reports, and psychological evaluations constitute gross neglect of duty.
  • Whether the respondents should be held administratively liable for their actions or inactions.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.