Title
Nuez vs. Cruz-Apao
Case
A.M. No. CA-05-18-P
Decision Date
Apr 12, 2005
CA employee solicited P1M for favorable ruling, caught in entrapment; found guilty of Grave Misconduct and Dishonesty, dismissed with forfeiture of benefits.

Case Digest (A.M. No. CA-05-18-P)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Nature and parties
  • This is an administrative case (A.M. No. CA-05-18-P) for dishonesty and grave misconduct against Elvira Cruz-Apao, Executive Assistant II, Acting Division Clerk of Court, 15th Division, Court of Appeals (CA).
  • Complainant Zaldy Nuez had a pending illegal dismissal case (“PAGCOR vs. Zaldy Nuez,” CA-G.R. SP No. 73460) in the CA for over two years.
  • Solicitation and entrapment
  • In July 2004, Nuez sought Cruz-Apao’s help for a speedy, favorable decision. Through calls and SMS messages, Cruz-Apao allegedly informed him that a researcher drafting the decision required ₱1,000,000.
  • Nuez complained to GMA’s Imbestigador and the Presidential Anti-Organized Crime Task Force (PAOCTF). On 28 September 2004, an entrapment operation was conducted at Jollibee, Times Plaza, Manila. Cruz-Apao was apprehended while allegedly receiving a marked‐money envelope from Nuez.
  • Investigative proceedings
  • CA Presiding Justice Cancio C. Garcia issued Office Order No. 297-04-CG creating an ad-hoc Committee (Justice Cosico, Salazar-Fernando, Dimaampao).
  • The Committee conducted hearings, examined text messages and testimonies, and found a prima facie case of dishonesty and serious misconduct. It recommended a 90-day preventive suspension and, later, Cruz-Apao’s dismissal.

Issues:

  • Whether respondent Cruz-Apao is guilty of dishonesty and grave misconduct for soliciting ₱1,000,000 in exchange for a favorable court decision.
  • Whether the evidence (testimony, SMS records, entrapment video, confession to superior) sufficiently proves the solicitation.
  • Whether the Solicitation violated Sections 1 and 2, Canon I of the Code of Conduct for Court Personnel.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.