Title
Noell Whessoe, Inc. vs. Independent Testing Consultants, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 199851
Decision Date
Nov 7, 2018
Noell Whessoe absolved from solidary liability for unpaid fees due to prior payment by Whessoe UK; moral damages denied as corporations cannot suffer emotional distress.
A

Case Digest (A.M. No. 06-9-545-RTC)

Facts:

  • Contractual Framework
    • Owner and Main Contractor
      • On November 7, 1996, Liquigaz Philippines Corporation (“Liquigaz”) and Whessoe Projects Limited (“Whessoe UK”) executed the Contract Agreement for the Mariveles Terminal Expansion Project.
      • Whessoe UK, in turn, on November 29, 1997, engaged Noell Whessoe Philippines Construction, Inc. (“Noell Whessoe”) under a Conditions of Contract for Supply of Professional, Technical and Management Services to act as construction manager.
    • Subcontracts and Confidentiality
      • On May 12, 1997, Whessoe UK subcontracted pipework and mechanical installation to Petrotech Systems, Inc. (“Petrotech”).
      • A Confidentiality Agreement dated April 12, 1997 was executed between Petrotech and Noell Whessoe, referring to Noell Whessoe as a “wholly owned subsidiary” of Whessoe UK.
  • Engagement of Independent Testing and Dispute
    • Sub-subcontract for Testing
      • In June 1998, Petrotech, as subcontractor of Liquigaz via Whessoe UK/Noell Whessoe, engaged Independent Testing Consultants, Inc. (“Independent Testing”) to perform non-destructive testing (NDT) on Liquigaz’s gas piping and storage tanks.
      • Independent Testing completed the work and issued two invoices totaling ₱1,063,465.70.
    • Non-payment and Collection Suit
      • Petrotech refused payment despite formal demands.
      • Independent Testing filed a complaint for collection of sum of money with damages against Petrotech, Liquigaz, and Noell Whessoe before RTC Branch 161, Pasig.
  • Judicial Proceedings
    • Regional Trial Court Decision (March 7, 2005)
      • Liquigaz and Noell Whessoe argued lack of privity; Petrotech defaulted.
      • RTC held Liquigaz, Noell Whessoe, and Petrotech solidarily liable for ₱1,063,465.70 plus legal interest, attorney’s fees (25% of claim), and costs.
    • Court of Appeals Decision (April 28, 2011) and Resolution (December 7, 2011)
      • CA affirmed with modifications:
        • Noell Whessoe and Petrotech to pay full claim jointly and severally;
        • Liquigaz’s liability limited to US$9,000 (or peso equivalent) with right of reimbursement from Petrotech;
        • Cross-claim in favor of Noell Whessoe against Petrotech granted;
        • Attorney’s fees deleted; costs of suit affirmed.
      • M/R denied.
    • Petition for Review on Certiorari
      • Noell Whessoe petitioned to overturn its solidarity liability, asserting lack of direct contract with Independent Testing and separate corporate identity from Whessoe UK.
      • It also claimed entitlement to moral damages for reputational harm.

Issues:

  • Whether Noell Whessoe, Inc. can be held solidarily liable with Liquigaz Philippines Corporation and Petrotech Systems, Inc. for unpaid fees of Independent Testing Consultants, Inc., despite no direct contractual privity.
  • Whether Noell Whessoe, Inc. is entitled to moral damages for alleged tarnishing of its business reputation.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.