Title
New Pacific Timber and Supply Co., Inc. vs. Seneris
Case
G.R. No. L-41764
Decision Date
Dec 19, 1980
Petitioner deposited full payment (cashier's check + cash) for judgment obligation, but auction proceeded. SC ruled payment valid, auction void, and judge abused discretion.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 191109)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Compromise Judgment
    • Petitioner New Pacific Timber & Supply Co., Inc. (defendant) and private respondent Ricardo A. Tong (plaintiff) entered into an amicable settlement in Civil Case No. 250 (1669), CFI Zamboanga City, Branch II.
    • On July 19, 1974, the court rendered a compromise judgment providing:
      • Payment of P54,500.00 plus 6% interest from August 25, 1972.
      • Payment of P6,000.00 attorney’s fees (P5,000.00 already paid; P1,000.00 balance).
      • Full payment due within five months.
      • Failure to comply entitles plaintiff to a writ of execution.
  • Execution Proceedings and Deposit
    • Upon petitioner’s default, the trial court issued a writ of execution on December 21, 1974 for P63,130.00, levying specified machinery.
    • Sale was set for January 15, 1975; petitioner deposited P63,130.00 (P50,000.00 cashier’s check + P13,130.00 cash) with the sheriff before sale date.
    • Private respondent refused the deposit and requested the sale proceed; the sale was postponed twice (January 15 and afternoon of January 15).
    • On January 16, 1975 at 10:00 a.m., after petitioner’s representatives failed to produce counsel, the sheriff auctioned the property to private respondent for P50,000.00, declaring a deficiency of P13,130.00.
    • The sheriff issued a Certificate of Sale in favor of private respondent on January 16, 1975.
    • On January 17, 1975, petitioner filed an ex parte motion for a Certificate of Satisfaction of Judgment; denied by the trial court on August 28, 1975.
    • On November 10, 1975, this Court issued a temporary restraining order enjoining delivery of the property to private respondent.

Issues:

  • Whether private respondent validly refused acceptance of payment by cashier’s check and cash deposit made before the scheduled auction.
  • Whether certiorari is the proper remedy to annul the trial court’s order denying the Certificate of Satisfaction of Judgment.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.